Literature DB >> 21143477

Small group employer participation in New Mexico's State Coverage Insurance program: lessons for federal reform.

Anna S Sommers1, Jean Marie Abraham, Laura Spicer, Asher Mikow, Mari Spaulding-Bynon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with small group employer participation in New Mexico's State Coverage Insurance (SCI) program. DATA SOURCES: Telephone surveys of employers participating in SCI (N=269) and small employers who inquired about SCI (N=148) were fielded September 2008-January 2009. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive and multivariate analyses investigated differences between employer samples, including employer characteristics, concerns that applied to the business when deciding whether to participate in SCI, prior offerings of insurance to workers, and perceived affordability of the program. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: Unweighted employer samples yielded 88 and 75 percent response rates for the participating and inquiring employers, respectively. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The administrative issue most commonly selected by inquiring employers as applying to their business was difficulty understanding how eligibility requirements applied to their business and its employees (53.5 percent). Inquiring businesses were significantly more likely to report concern about affording to pay the premiums in the first month (35.6 versus 18.7 percent) and the cost to the business over the long run (46.5 versus 26.6 percent) relative to participating employers. From the model results, businesses with the fewest full-time employees (zero to two) were 19 percentage points less likely to participate relative to businesses with six or more full-time employees.
CONCLUSIONS: Administrative and cost barriers to participation in SCI reported by employers suggest that the tax credit offered to small businesses under new federal provisions, which merely offsets the employer portion of premium, could be more effective if accompanied by additional supports to businesses. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21143477      PMCID: PMC3037782          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01216.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  6 in total

1.  Small employers and health benefits: findings from the 2002 small employer health benefits survey.

Authors:  Paul Fronstin; Ruth Helman; Mathew Greenwald
Journal:  EBRI Issue Brief       Date:  2003-01

2.  Reducing the number of uninsured by subsidizing employment-based health insurance. Results from a pilot study.

Authors:  K E Thorpe; A Hendricks; D Garnick; K Donelan; J P Newhouse
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Access to health insurance at small establishments: what can we learn from analyzing other fringe benefits?

Authors:  Jean Marie Abraham; Thomas DeLeire; Anne Beeson Royalty
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Sources of health insurance and characteristics of the uninsured: analysis of the March 2009 Current Population Survey.

Authors:  Paul Fronstin
Journal:  EBRI Issue Brief       Date:  2009-09

5.  More offers, fewer takers for employment-based health insurance: 1987 and 1996.

Authors:  P F Cooper; B S Schone
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Small employers and the health insurance market.

Authors:  M A Morrisey; G A Jensen; R J Morlock
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 6.301

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Harvesting the lessons of state health policy.

Authors:  Lynn A Blewett; Andrew B Bindman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.402

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.