BACKGROUND/AIM: We investigated the 4-year incidence and predictors of adefovir resistance in chronic hepatitis B patients with or without lamivudine (LAM)-resistance treated with adefovir dipivoxil with or without short-term LAM overlapping. METHODS: One hundred and two LAM-resistant patients and 79 without LAM resistance (36 naïve and 43 prior LAM exposure) treated with adefovir for >12 months were prospectively examined. RESULTS: Cumulative incidences of adefovir resistance at month 12, 24, 36 and 48 were 3.9, 21.1, 31.8 and 43% respectively in LAM-resistant patients. Cirrhosis was a significant risk factor for adefovir resistance. A similar rate of adefovir resistance was observed for LAM-resistant patients and those with prior LAM exposure without resistance. Regarding LAM-resistant patients, compared with those having hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels <300 copies/ml, patients having HBV DNA levels >10(4) copies/ml at week 24 of therapy had a hazard ratio (HR) of 9.8 for adefovir resistance development, while those without LAM resistance having the same HBV DNA levels at week 48 had a similar HR (9.5). Multidrug-resistant (LAM+adefovir) variants were detected by direct sequencing in three of 35 LAM-resistant patients treated with a switch to adefovir. Two of them had resistant mutations to both drugs on the same viral genome as determined by molecular cloning and sequencing. CONCLUSION: The incidence of adefovir resistance was high in LAM-resistant patients treated with sequential adefovir. High HBV DNA levels at week 24 and 48 of therapy were the strongest predictors for adefovir resistance development in patients with and without LAM resistance respectively.
BACKGROUND/AIM: We investigated the 4-year incidence and predictors of adefovir resistance in chronic hepatitis Bpatients with or without lamivudine (LAM)-resistance treated with adefovir dipivoxil with or without short-term LAM overlapping. METHODS: One hundred and two LAM-resistant patients and 79 without LAM resistance (36 naïve and 43 prior LAM exposure) treated with adefovir for >12 months were prospectively examined. RESULTS: Cumulative incidences of adefovir resistance at month 12, 24, 36 and 48 were 3.9, 21.1, 31.8 and 43% respectively in LAM-resistant patients. Cirrhosis was a significant risk factor for adefovir resistance. A similar rate of adefovir resistance was observed for LAM-resistant patients and those with prior LAM exposure without resistance. Regarding LAM-resistant patients, compared with those having hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels <300 copies/ml, patients having HBV DNA levels >10(4) copies/ml at week 24 of therapy had a hazard ratio (HR) of 9.8 for adefovir resistance development, while those without LAM resistance having the same HBV DNA levels at week 48 had a similar HR (9.5). Multidrug-resistant (LAM+adefovir) variants were detected by direct sequencing in three of 35 LAM-resistant patients treated with a switch to adefovir. Two of them had resistant mutations to both drugs on the same viral genome as determined by molecular cloning and sequencing. CONCLUSION: The incidence of adefovir resistance was high in LAM-resistant patients treated with sequential adefovir. High HBV DNA levels at week 24 and 48 of therapy were the strongest predictors for adefovir resistance development in patients with and without LAM resistance respectively.