Literature DB >> 21143330

A restricted hybrid zone between native and introduced red fox (Vulpes vulpes) populations suggests reproductive barriers and competitive exclusion.

Benjamin N Sacks1, Marcelle Moore, Mark J Statham, Heiko U Wittmer.   

Abstract

Introduced species can threaten native taxa in multiple ways, including competition and hybridization, which can reduce fitness, alter ecological niches or swamp native genomes. Encroachment and hybridization by introduced species also provide opportunities to study the dynamics of invasiveness and hybridization during early stages following contact. We used 33 microsatellites, 51 single nucleotide polymorphisms and a mtDNA marker to characterize the extent and spatial pattern of encroachment and hybridization between a native, endemic subspecies of red fox (Vulpes vulpes patwin) and an introduced red fox population composed of highly admixed, phylogenetically divergent stock, resulting from a century of domestication. Both nuclear and mtDNA markers indicated that hybridization was primarily restricted to a narrow zone where the two populations came into contact. Although a few introgressed genotypes were detected in the interior of the native range, we found no immigrant foxes or F(1) or F(2) hybrids there, suggesting native foxes excluded introduced individuals. We speculate that the observed interbreeding at the periphery was facilitated by low densities. In total, 98% of mtDNA haplotypes in the native range were native and 96% of the nuclear ancestry was estimated to be native. Although the introduced range had expanded fivefold over the past four decades, native and non-native haplotypes from museum samples collected in and near the native range three decades earlier showed a similar geographic distribution as today, suggesting that the native range and hybrid zone were relatively stable. We hypothesize that the monogamous mating system of red foxes and other wild canids may enhance their resistance to hybridization because of greater fitness consequences associated with mate discrimination.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21143330     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04943.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  9 in total

1.  Y-Chromosome Markers for the Red Fox.

Authors:  Halie M Rando; Jeremy T Stutchman; Estelle R Bastounes; Jennifer L Johnson; Carlos A Driscoll; Christina S Barr; Lyudmila N Trut; Benjamin N Sacks; Anna V Kukekova
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  Landscape genetics of the nonnative red fox of California.

Authors:  Benjamin N Sacks; Jennifer L Brazeal; Jeffrey C Lewis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Assessment of coyote-wolf-dog admixture using ancestry-informative diagnostic SNPs.

Authors:  J Monzón; R Kays; D E Dykhuizen
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Insight into the Genetic Population Structure of Wild Red Foxes in Poland Reveals Low Risk of Genetic Introgression from Escaped Farm Red Foxes.

Authors:  Heliodor Wierzbicki; Magdalena Zatoń-Dobrowolska; Anna Mucha; Magdalena Moska
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Genetic and spatial characterization of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) population in the area stretching between the Eastern and Dinaric Alps and its relationship with rabies and canine distemper dynamics.

Authors:  Bianca Zecchin; Marco De Nardi; Pierre Nouvellet; Cristiano Vernesi; Massimiliano Babbucci; Barbara Crestanello; Zoltán Bagó; Tomislav Bedeković; Peter Hostnik; Adelaide Milani; Christl Ann Donnelly; Luca Bargelloni; Monica Lorenzetto; Carlo Citterio; Federica Obber; Paola De Benedictis; Giovanni Cattoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Contrasting genetic trajectories of endangered and expanding red fox populations in the western U.S.

Authors:  Cate B Quinn; Sophie Preckler-Quisquater; Jocelyn R Akins; Patrick R Cross; Preston B Alden; Stevi L Vanderzwan; John A Stephenson; Pete J Figura; Gregory A Green; Tim L Hiller; Benjamin N Sacks
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.832

7.  Mitochondrial Analysis of the Most Basal Canid Reveals Deep Divergence between Eastern and Western North American Gray Foxes (Urocyon spp.) and Ancient Roots in Pleistocene California.

Authors:  Natalie S Goddard; Mark J Statham; Benjamin N Sacks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  First regional evaluation of nuclear genetic diversity and population structure in northeastern coyotes ( Canis latrans).

Authors:  Javier Monzón
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-03-03

9.  Efficient Genome-Wide Sequencing and Low-Coverage Pedigree Analysis from Noninvasively Collected Samples.

Authors:  Noah Snyder-Mackler; William H Majoros; Michael L Yuan; Amanda O Shaver; Jacob B Gordon; Gisela H Kopp; Stephen A Schlebusch; Jeffrey D Wall; Susan C Alberts; Sayan Mukherjee; Xiang Zhou; Jenny Tung
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.