BACKGROUND: Relapse risk factors, such as psychological stress and alcohol cues, are often encountered together. Understanding how they interact has the potential to improve alcoholism treatments. This study was conducted to examine whether an acute psychosocial stressor enhanced alcohol cue reactivity in non-treatment-seeking alcoholics. METHODS:Seventy-nine alcohol-dependent individuals (39 women) randomly received either theTrier Social Stress Test or a no-stress control condition. Stress reactivity was measured with serum adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol, mean arterial blood pressure, and subjective distress. Immediately following the stress manipulation, participants held and sniffed a neutral cue then their preferred alcoholic beverage. Cue reactivity was measured by 2 subjective measures of craving following each cue. Additionally, general craving was assessed with the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire at the beginning and end of the laboratory procedure. RESULTS: The stress manipulation showed internal validity on all measures of stress reactivity. There was not a main effect of stress nor a stress × cue interaction on either cue reactivity measure. As expected, there was a main effect of cue (alcohol > neutral cue) on both measures of cue reactivity. General craving increased during the challenge, but not differently by stress group. Magnitude of stress reactivity was not associated with magnitude of cue reactivity, and all results were independent of gender. CONCLUSION: In this well-controlled clinical laboratory study of non-treatment-seeking alcoholics, an acute psychological stressor did not make an alcohol cue a more potent urge-inducing stimulus, and stress had no effect on general alcohol craving.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Relapse risk factors, such as psychological stress and alcohol cues, are often encountered together. Understanding how they interact has the potential to improve alcoholism treatments. This study was conducted to examine whether an acute psychosocial stressor enhanced alcohol cue reactivity in non-treatment-seeking alcoholics. METHODS: Seventy-nine alcohol-dependent individuals (39 women) randomly received either the Trier Social Stress Test or a no-stress control condition. Stress reactivity was measured with serum adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol, mean arterial blood pressure, and subjective distress. Immediately following the stress manipulation, participants held and sniffed a neutral cue then their preferred alcoholic beverage. Cue reactivity was measured by 2 subjective measures of craving following each cue. Additionally, general craving was assessed with the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire at the beginning and end of the laboratory procedure. RESULTS: The stress manipulation showed internal validity on all measures of stress reactivity. There was not a main effect of stress nor a stress × cue interaction on either cue reactivity measure. As expected, there was a main effect of cue (alcohol > neutral cue) on both measures of cue reactivity. General craving increased during the challenge, but not differently by stress group. Magnitude of stress reactivity was not associated with magnitude of cue reactivity, and all results were independent of gender. CONCLUSION: In this well-controlled clinical laboratory study of non-treatment-seeking alcoholics, an acute psychological stressor did not make an alcohol cue a more potent urge-inducing stimulus, and stress had no effect on general alcohol craving.
Authors: David T George; Jodi Gilman; Jacqueline Hersh; Annika Thorsell; David Herion; Christopher Geyer; Xiaomei Peng; William Kielbasa; Robert Rawlings; John E Brandt; Donald R Gehlert; Johannes T Tauscher; Stephen P Hunt; Daniel Hommer; Markus Heilig Journal: Science Date: 2008-02-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Suzanne E Thomas; Amy K Bacon; Patrick K Randall; Kathleen T Brady; Ronald E See Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Jennifer G Plebani; Lara A Ray; Meghan E Morean; William R Corbin; James MacKillop; Michael Amlung; Andrea C King Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Aimee L McRae-Clark; Rickey E Carter; Kimber L Price; Nathaniel L Baker; Suzanne Thomas; Michael E Saladin; Kathleen Giarla; Katherine Nicholas; Kathleen T Brady Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Laura E Kwako; Melanie L Schwandt; Joanna R Sells; Vijay A Ramchandani; Daniel W Hommer; David T George; Rajita Sinha; Markus Heilig Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 4.280