Literature DB >> 21143022

High-performance metabolic marker assessment in breast cancer tissue by mass spectrometry.

Maria Chiara Mimmi1, Paola Picotti, Alessandra Corazza, Elena Betto, Carlo E Pucillo, Laura Cesaratto, Carla Cedolini, Viviana Londero, Chiara Zuiani, Massimo Bazzocchi, Gennaro Esposito.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The identification of reliable markers for diagnosis of breast cancer has been thoroughly addressed by metabolic profiling using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy or imaging. Several clear diagnostic indicators have emerged using either in vitro analysis of tissue extracts, ex vivo analysis of biopsies or in vivo direct spectral observations. Most of the breast cancer characteristic metabolites could be assayed by mass spectrometry (MS) to exploit the superior sensitivity of this technique and therefore reduce the traumatic impact of current biopsy procedures.
METHODS: Following extraction, aqueous metabolite mixtures were obtained that were submitted to liquid-chromatography, electrospray-ionization, mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS) analysis to estimate the content of choline (Cho) and its phosphorylated derivatives, phosphocholine (PCho) and glycerophosphocholine (GPCho). The determinations were performed using 10 samples from breast tissue biopsies, surgical specimens and one single sample of a hepatic metastasis. In addition, some measurements were also repeated using high-resolution ¹H NMR spectroscopy to complement the mass spectrometry results.
RESULTS: The contents of Cho, PCho and GPCho in breast tissue extracts were estimated by LC/ESI-MS based on standard compound calibration curves. Sharply increased ratios of phosphorylated-to-unphosphorylated metabolites, PCho/ Cho and (PCho+GPCho)/Cho, were observed in all tumor samples, although without discrimination between benign and malignant lesions, contrary to samples from healthy individuals and from those with fibrocystic disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of breast cancer markers by LC/ESI-MS is feasible and diagnostically valuable. In addition to high sensitivity, the approach also shows a resolution advantage for assaying choline derivatives compared to NMR, and could complement the latter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21143022     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

1.  Metabonomics-based omics study and atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Duo-Jiao Wu; Bi-Jun Zhu; Xiang-Dong Wang
Journal:  J Clin Bioinforma       Date:  2011-10-31

2.  Proton and phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the healthy human breast at 7 T.

Authors:  Wybe J M van der Kemp; Bertine L Stehouwer; Vincent O Boer; Peter R Luijten; Dennis W J Klomp; Jannie P Wijnen
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 3.  Breast cancer in the era of integrating "Omics" approaches.

Authors:  Claudia Rossi; Ilaria Cicalini; Maria Concetta Cufaro; Ada Consalvo; Prabin Upadhyaya; Gianluca Sala; Ivana Antonucci; Piero Del Boccio; Liborio Stuppia; Vincenzo De Laurenzi
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 6.524

4.  Comparison of extraction methods for intracellular metabolomics of human tissues.

Authors:  Carolin Andresen; Tobias Boch; Hagen M Gegner; Nils Mechtel; Andreas Narr; Emrullah Birgin; Erik Rasbach; Nuh Rahbari; Andreas Trumpp; Gernot Poschet; Daniel Hübschmann
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-08-26

5.  A Crosstalk- and Interferent-Free Dual Electrode Amperometric Biosensor for the Simultaneous Determination of Choline and Phosphocholine.

Authors:  Rosanna Ciriello; Antonio Guerrieri
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  "OMIC" tumor markers for breast cancer: A review.

Authors:  Naila Irum Hadi; Qamar Jamal
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.