Literature DB >> 21142745

Comparison of quality of life between voice rehabilitated and nonrehabilitated laryngectomies in a developing world community.

Bipin Thomas Varghese1, Aleyamma Mathew, Paul Sebastian, Elizabeth Mathew Iype, Archana Vijay.   

Abstract

CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life (QOL) scores were significantly higher among voice rehabilitated patients although this was accompanied by significant immediate and long-term morbidity and a cost implication for the patient.
OBJECTIVE: We present a prospective and cross-over study of overall QOL and morbidity related to voice restoration in laryngectomees.
METHODS: The EORTC QOL questionnaire (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N-35) was distributed among all the consenting patients alive after laryngectomy from January 2008 to October 2009. In patients who had secondary voice rehabilitation, post-rehabilitation QOL scores were collected separately. Comparison of QOL between the non-rehabilitated and rehabilitated cohorts was done and a cross-over study of pre-rehabilitation and post-rehabilitation scores were done in the second cohort.
RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were studied. QOL scores were significantly higher among voice rehabilitated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21142745     DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2010.526960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  8 in total

1.  Objective and perceptual analysis of outcome of voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy in an Indian tertiary referral cancer centre.

Authors:  B T Varghese; A Mathew; S Sebastian; E M Iype; P Sebastian; B Rajan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-03-23

2.  Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients after tumor therapy and subsequent rehabilitation: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Judit Nagy; Gábor Braunitzer; Márk Antal; Csaba Berkovits; Péter Novák; Katalin Nagy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Rachel Kaye; Christopher G Tang; Catherine F Sinclair
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2017-06-21

4.  Quality of Life with Voice Prosthesis after Total Laryngectomy.

Authors:  Nicola Massaro; Barbara Verro; Giuseppe Greco; Enzo Chianetta; Aurelio D'Ecclesia; Carmelo Saraniti
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-09

5.  Comprehensive Evaluation of Vocal Outcomes and Quality of Life after Total Laryngectomy and Voice Restoration with J-Flap and Tracheoesophageal Puncture.

Authors:  Chung-Kan Tsao; Filippo Marchi; Chung-Jan Kang; Claudio Sampieri; Yi-An Lu; Shiang-Fu Huang; Yu-Ting Chen; Giorgio Giordano; Giorgio Peretti; Giampiero Parrinello; Andrea Iandelli; Tuan-Jen Fang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Social support and substitute voice acquisition on psychological adjustment among patients after laryngectomy.

Authors:  Kumiko Kotake; Yoshimi Suzukamo; Ichiro Kai; Kazuyo Iwanaga; Aya Takahashi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Quality of life among total laryngectomized patients undergoing speech rehabilitation: correlation between several instruments.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Soares Raquel; Elaine Pires Buzaneli; Hevely Saray Lima Silveira; Marcia Simões-Zenari; Marco Aurélio Valmondes Kulcsar; Luiz Paulo Kowalski; Kátia Nemr
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Analysis of Postsurgical Health-Related Quality of Life and Quality of Voice of Patients With Laryngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jie Luo; Jieli Wu; Kexing Lv; Kaichun Li; Jianhui Wu; Yihui Wen; Xiaoling Li; Haocheng Tang; Aiyun Jiang; Zhangfeng Wang; Weiping Wen; Wenbin Lei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.