Literature DB >> 21142524

Prototype hybrid systems for neonatal warming: in vitro comparisons to standard of care devices.

Terrence L Hubert1, Rolf Lindemann, Jichuan Wu, Catherine Agnew, Thomas H Shaffer, Marla R Wolfson.   

Abstract

Preterm infants lack necessary thermoregulation. An ideal incubator should maintain a uniform and constant thermal environment. We compared the effectiveness of a supplemental heating blanket to improve the heating characteristics of two different incubator warming devices using assessment of their respective function alone as controls. Device A and device B, with and without a heating blanket (Harvard Apparatus), were instrumented with a distribution matrix of multiple temperature (n = 11) and humidity probes. These data were serially measured during warm up to 37.5 °C and through a series of open-door perturbations. The time constant, temperature variation, and change in air temperature were calculated. Data were analyzed for significance by 2-factor ANOVA for each respective incubator either turned on or off with either the heating blanket turned on or off. Device A warms faster (33.87% ; p < 0.05) than device B, but has a greater (37.27% ; p < 0.05) temperature variation during warmup. The heating blanket enhances the thermal response of device A during warmup, but does not alter those of device B. With the side door open, device A shows a smaller (-16.5% ; p < 0.05) temperature variation than device B; the heating blanket attenuates the temperature change in both devices. These results demonstrate that the use of a supplemental heating blanket, as well as device-related differences, may impact clinical control of a thermal environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21142524      PMCID: PMC3888790          DOI: 10.2345/0899-8205-44.6.523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol        ISSN: 0899-8205


  7 in total

1.  Thermal stability and transition studies with a hybrid warming device for neonates.

Authors:  J S Greenspan; A B Cullen; S M Touch; M R Wolfson; T H Shaffer
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2001 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  The incubator controversy: pediatricians and the origins of premature infant technology in the United States, 1890 to 1910.

Authors:  J P Baker
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  A prototype infant incubator for heliox therapy.

Authors:  Clifford J Singhaus; Suzanne M Touch; Jay S Greenspan; Marla R Wolfson; Thomas H Shaffer
Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr

4.  Effectiveness of a simple heated water-filled mattress for the prevention and treatment of neonatal hypothermia in the labour room.

Authors:  N Y Boo; S Selvarani
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Environmental temperature control in very low birth weight infants (less than 1000 grams) cared for in double-walled incubators.

Authors:  P Chessex; S Blouet; J Vaucher
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Heat balance in premature infants: comparative effects of convectively heated incubator and radiant warmer, with without plastic heat shield.

Authors:  E F Bell; M R Weinstein; W Oh
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 7.  Cot-nursing versus incubator care for preterm infants.

Authors:  P H Gray; V Flenady
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.