Literature DB >> 21140212

Saddlepoint p-values and confidence intervals for a class of two sample permutation tests for current status and panel count data.

Ehab F Abd-Elfattah1.   

Abstract

The current status and panel count data frequently arise from cancer and tumorigenicity studies when events currently occur. A common and widely used class of two sample tests, for current status and panel count data, is the permutation class. We manipulate the double saddlepoint method to calculate the exact mid-p-values of the underlying permutation distributions of this class of tests. Permutation simulations are replaced by analytical saddlepoint computations which provide extremely accurate mid-p-values that are exact for most practical purposes and almost always more accurate than normal approximations. The method is illustrated using two real tumorigenicity panel count data. To compare the saddlepoint approximation with the normal asymptotic approximation, a simulation study is conducted. The speed and accuracy of the saddlepoint method facilitate the calculation of the confidence interval for the treatment effect. The inversion of the mid-p-values to calculate the confidence interval for the mean rate of development of the recurrent event is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21140212     DOI: 10.1007/s10985-010-9190-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  9 in total

Review 1.  Generalizations of current status data with applications.

Authors:  N P Jewell; M V Laan
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  A proportional hazards model for interval-censored failure time data.

Authors:  D M Finkelstein
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Proportional hazards models for current status data: application to the study of differentials in age at weaning in Pakistan.

Authors:  I D Diamond; J W McDonald; I H Shah
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1986-11

4.  Nonparametric methods for survival/sacrifice experiments.

Authors:  A Dewanji; J D Kalbfleisch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Statistical analysis of survival experiments.

Authors:  D G Hoel; H E Walburg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Nonparametric methods for analyzing incomplete nondecreasing repeated measurements.

Authors:  C S Davis; L J Wei
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Guidelines for simple, sensitive significance tests for carcinogenic effects in long-term animal experiments.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; N E Day; R G Gray; P N Lee; S Parish; J Peto; S Richards; J Wahrendorf
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum Suppl       Date:  1980

8.  Nonparametric tests of tumor prevalence data.

Authors:  J Sun; J D Kalbfleisch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  A comparison of tumour incidence analyses applicable in single-sacrifice animal experiments.

Authors:  G E Dinse
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994 Mar 15-Apr 15       Impact factor: 2.373

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Exploring memory function in earthquake trauma survivors with resting-state fMRI and machine learning.

Authors:  Yuchen Li; Hongru Zhu; Zhengjia Ren; Su Lui; Minlan Yuan; Qiyong Gong; Cui Yuan; Meng Gao; Changjian Qiu; Wei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.630

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.