Literature DB >> 21139132

Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement using a T-fastener gastropexy device in head and neck and esophageal cancer patients.

Krishdeep Singh Chadha1, Chandana Thatikonda, Michael Schiff, Hector Nava, Michael D Sitrin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement by the pull technique in head, neck, and esophageal cancer patients has a high complication rate, particularly in infections, and a small risk of tumor implantation. The T-fastener gastropexy technique uses a transabdominal approach to place the PEG device.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to review the clinical outcomes and complications related to endoscopic PEG placement with the T-fastener gastropexy technique in patients with head, neck, and esophageal cancers.
METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of all patients with head, neck, and esophageal cancers with PEG placement from January 1998 to June 2008. Clinical data including patient's age, gender, type and stage of cancer, date of PEG placement and removal, and reason for PEG removal was recorded.
RESULTS: The study group consisted of a total of 356 patients of which 244 were male and 112 were female with a mean age of 63.3 years. There were 276 patients with head and neck cancer, 75 patients with esophageal cancer, and 5 with gastro-esophageal junction cancer. Staging data was available for 326 patients of which 56 (17.1%) had early stage disease (stage 1 and 2) and 270 patients (82.9%) had late stage (3 and 4) disease. None of these patients received antibiotic prophylaxis prior to PEG placement. Cellulitis around the PEG site occurred in 8.4% of cases and an abscess in 3.7% of cases. Only 4 (1.2%) infectious complications were within the first 30 days of PEG placement, and there were no intraoperative deaths or cases of tumor implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: In the authors' experience, the T-fastener gastropexy technique for PEG placement in head, neck, and esophageal cancer patients carried a low overall complication rate and compared favorably with the results of pull method reported in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21139132     DOI: 10.1177/0884533610385350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract        ISSN: 0884-5336            Impact factor:   3.080


  7 in total

Review 1.  Gastroenteric tube feeding: techniques, problems and solutions.

Authors:  Irina Blumenstein; Yogesh M Shastri; Jürgen Stein
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Comparison of the pull and introducer percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy techniques in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Felipe A Retes; Fabio S Kawaguti; Marcelo S de Lima; Bruno da Costa Martins; Ricardo S Uemura; Gustavo A de Paulo; Caterina Mp Pennacchi; Carla Gusmon; Adriana Vs Ribeiro; Elisa R Baba; Sebastian N Geiger; Mauricio P Sorbello; Marco A Kulcsar; Ulysses Ribeiro; Fauze Maluf-Filho
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy: Indications and techniques.

Authors:  Alessandro Fugazza; Antonio Capogreco; Annalisa Cappello; Rosangela Nicoletti; Leonardo Da Rio; Piera Alessia Galtieri; Roberta Maselli; Silvia Carrara; Gaia Pellegatta; Marco Spadaccini; Edoardo Vespa; Matteo Colombo; Kareem Khalaf; Alessandro Repici; Andrea Anderloni
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-05-16

4.  Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion in cancer patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Hala Mansoor; Muhammad Adnan Masood; Muhammed Aasim Yusuf
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-12

5.  Gastropexy using the Carter-Thomason device in lieu of T-fasteners in a critically ill, severely obese patient: an innovative technique.

Authors:  Laura H Rosenberger; Yinin Hu; Zequan Yang; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.719

6.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with Funada-style gastropexy greatly reduces the risk of peristomal infection.

Authors:  Naoki Okumura; Naoko Tsuji; Nobuto Ozaki; Nozomu Matsumoto; Takehisa Takaba; Masanori Kawasaki; Takafumi Tomita; Yasuko Umehara; Satoko Taniike; Masashi Kono; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2015-01-06

Review 7.  Risk of tumor implantation in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the upper aerodigestive tumors.

Authors:  Francesca Vincenzi; Giuseppina De Caro; Federica Gaiani; Fabiola Fornaroli; Roberta Minelli; Gioacchino Leandro; Francesco Di Mario; Gian Luigi De' Angelis
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2018-12-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.