Literature DB >> 21139079

Limited clinical relevance of imaging techniques in the follow-up of patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of a meta-analysis.

Barbara F Eichhorst1, Kirsten Fischer, Anna-Maria Fink, Thomas Elter, Clemens M Wendtner, Valentin Goede, Manuela Bergmann, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Georg Hopfinger, Matthias Ritgen, Jasmin Bahlo, Raymonde Busch, Michael Hallek.   

Abstract

The clinical value of imaging is well established for the follow-up of many lymphoid malignancies but not for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). A meta-analysis was performed with the dataset of 3 German CLL Study Group phase 3 trials (CLL4, CLL5, and CLL8) that included 1372 patients receiving first-line therapy for CLL. Response as well as progression during follow-up was reassessed according to the National Cancer Institute Working Group1996 criteria. A total of 481 events were counted as progressive disease during treatment or follow-up. Of these, 372 progressions (77%) were detected by clinical symptoms or blood counts. Computed tomography (CT) scans or ultrasound were relevant in 44 and 29 cases (9% and 6%), respectively. The decision for relapse treatment was determined by CT scan or ultrasound results in only 2 of 176 patients (1%). CT scan results had an impact on the prognosis of patients in complete remission only after the administration of conventional chemotherapy but not after chemoimmunotherapy. In conclusion, physical examination and blood count remain the methods of choice for staging and clinical follow-up of patients with CLL as recommended by the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 2008 guidelines. These trials are registered at http://www.isrctn.org as ISRCTN 75653261 and ISRCTN 36294212 and at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00281918.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21139079     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-282228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Choosing wisely recommendations in hematology and oncology].

Authors:  S W Krause; A Neubauer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  High fluorescence in situ hybridization percentage of deletion 11q in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia is an independent predictor of adverse outcome.

Authors:  Preetesh Jain; Michael Keating; Phillip A Thompson; Long Trinh; Xuemei Wang; William Wierda; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Jan Burger; Hagop Kantarjian; Zeev Estrov; Lynne Abruzzo; Susan O'Brien
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 10.047

3.  Canadian evidence-based guideline for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  C Owen; A S Gerrie; V Banerji; S Assouline; C Chen; K S Robinson; E Lye; G Fraser
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Ofatumumab-based chemoimmunotherapy is effective and well tolerated in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Authors:  Tait Shanafelt; Mark C Lanasa; Timothy G Call; Anne W Beaven; Jose F Leis; Betsy LaPlant; Deborah Bowen; Michael Conte; Diane F Jelinek; Curtis A Hanson; Neil E Kay; Clive S Zent
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  MiR-181b: new perspective to evaluate disease progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Rosa Visone; Angelo Veronese; Veronica Balatti; Carlo M Croce
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2012-02

6.  Practical approach to management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Lukáš Smolej; Martin Šimkovič
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.318

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.