| Literature DB >> 21139063 |
Emma C Thomson1, Vicki M Fleming, Janice Main, Paul Klenerman, Jonathan Weber, Joseph Eliahoo, Jennifer Smith, Myra O McClure, Peter Karayiannis.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: An epidemic of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in HIV-positive men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) is emerging in Europe, Australia and the USA. The aim of this study was to characterise the natural history of primary HCV in this setting and to assess host and viral factors which predict spontaneous clearance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21139063 PMCID: PMC3095479 DOI: 10.1136/gut.2010.217166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut ISSN: 0017-5749 Impact factor: 23.059
Figure 1Patient cohort diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. A total of 112 HIV-positive patients with acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) were recruited to the the St Mary's Acute HCV Cohort study of whom 17 spontaneously cleared HCV. Treatment with pegylated interferon α (IFNα) and ribavirin was given for 48 weeks to 62 patients and withheld or delayed in a further 26. The sustained virological response rate was 66%. Ab, antibody; LFTs, liver function tests; RT-PCR, reverse transcription–PCR.
Figure 2Clinical measures and outcome in (A) the whole cohort and (B) representative individual patients. Longitudinal hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral load measurements taken prior to treatment revealed three patterns of infection: spontaneous clearance (SC; 15%, red) and two patterns of progression (85%); peak and plateau (PV; 47.5%, black) or fluctuating viraemia (FV; 37.5%, blue) defined as a viral load peak followed by a decline (>1 log10) and subsequent rise in viraemia (>1 log10). Viral loads (VLs) obtained from spontaneous clearers (red), plateau progressors (black) and fluctuating progressors (blue) groups were pooled and plotted using a linear fit model from the time of peak viraemia to 300 days (insert). VL data were right-censored at the time of treatment for HCV. Grey shading indicates 95% CIs.
Clinical measures and outcome (spontaneous clearance vs progression)
| Clinical measure (units, normal range) | Spontaneous clearance (median, 95% CI) | Progression | Range | HR (95% CI) | p Value | |
| Plateau viraemia (median, 95% CI) | Fluctuating viraemia (median, 95% CI) | |||||
| Number | 17 (15%) | 53 (47.5%) | 42 (37.5%) | – | – | – |
| Age (years) | 37 (32 to 44) | 39 (37 to 42) | 39 (37 to 40) | HR represents change in hazard per year of age | 1.00 (0.94 to 1.06) | 1.00 |
| Baseline HCV VL log10 (IU/ml) | 6.11 (1.79 to 7.35) | 6.25 (5.71 to 6.44) | 5.89 (5.06 to 6.13) | HR represents change in hazard per log10 change in VL | 0.75 (0.55 to 1.01) | 0.06 |
| Peak HCV VL log10 (IU/ml) | 6.11 (1.79 to 7.35) | 6.52 (6.36 to 6.88) | 6.21 (5.87 to 6.72) | 0.61 (0.46 to 0.80) | <0.0001** | |
| HIV VL (copies/ml) | <50 (<50 to 7044) | <50 (<50 to 1185) | 87 (<50 to 6847) | 1.00 (1.00 to 1.00) | 0.40 | |
| Elevated bilirubin (0–17 μmol/l) | 30 (12 to 60) | 16 (14 to 19) | 14 (12 to 17) | <20 | 1 | |
| 20–40 | 1.64 (0.48 to 5.6) | 0.43 | ||||
| ≥40 | 5.04 (1.60 to 15.92) | 0.006** | ||||
| Peak ALT (0–40 IU/l) | 347 (128 to 1792) | 308 (204 to 420) | 500 (316 to 659) | <1000 | 1 | |
| ≥1000 | 2.62 (1.01 to 6.80) | 0.048* | ||||
| CD4 count (300–1400 ×106/l) | 650 (490 to 829) | 510 (439 to 640) | 520 (453 to 619) | <650 | ||
| ≥650 | 2.66 (1.02 to 6.91) | 0.045* | ||||
| Nadir CD4 (300–1400 ×106/l) | 340 (200 to 519) | 310 (280 to 350) | 315 (270 to 367) | ≥200 | ||
| <200 | 1.51 (0.52 to 4.35) | 0.45 | ||||
| Transmission | ||||||
| IDU | 3/13 (23%) | 13/44 (30%) | 13/36 (36%) | All patients were MSM and had had recent unprotected sex | 1.63 (0.27 to 2.75) | 0.36 |
| INDU | 9/12 (75%) | 31/42 (74%) | 27/34 (79%) | 0.92 (0.25 to 3.46) | 0.94 | |
| Sexual | 14/14 (100%) | 46/46 (100%) | 39/39 (100%) | – | – | |
| HAART | 11/15 (73%) | 31/53 (58%) | 23/42 (55%) | 1.63 (0.57 to 4.70) | 0.36 | |
*Significant p value<0.05, **highly significant p value<0.01.
p values shown represent all progressors (fluctuating viraemia and plateau viraemia) versus clearer (spontaneous clearance) groups.
Indicates baseline.
Intravenous, intramuscular or subcutaneous drug use (crystal methamphetamine, cocaine, anabolic steroids, heroin).
Intranasal drug use (ketamine, cocaine).
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy; HCV, hepatitis C virus; MSM, men-who-have-sex-sith-men; VL, viral load.
Median viral load (VL) drop in untreated spontaneous clearers and progressors
| Spontaneous clearers (SC) (95% CI) | Progressors | HR | p Value | ||
| (PV) (95% CI) | (FV) (95% CI) | ||||
| Maximum HCV VL log10 (IU/ml) drop within 100 days from first positive PCR | 2.20 (1.65 to 5.03) | 0.03 (–0.33 to 0.23) | 0.58 (0.25 to 0.96) | 1.78 (1.45 to 2.18) | <0.0001 |
| Maximum HCV VL log10 (IU/ml) drop within 200 days from first positive PCR | 3.46 (1.70 to 7.05) | 0.17 (–0.06 to 0.38) | 0.85 (0.45 to 1.77) | 1.68 (1.40 to 2.02) | <0.0001 |
HR represents change in hazard per log10 change in VL.
Highly significant p value <0.01.
HCV, hepatitis C virus.
Viral sequence analyses and predictors of spontaneous clearance
| Clearers (95% CI) | Progressors (PV+FV) (95% CI) | p Value | |
| Number | 10 | 40 | – |
| Baseline quasispecies | 3 (2 to 5) | 4 (3 to 6) | 0.21 |
| Cumulative quasispecies (two samples taken <150 days apart) | 7 (7 to 8) | 9 (8 to 12) | 0.24 |
| Baseline Hamming distance | 0.39 (0.22 to 0.92) | 0.64 (0.36 to 2.97) | 0.38 |
| Cumulative Hamming distance (two samples taken <150 days apart) | 0.03 (0 to 0.06) | 2.045 (0.81 to 10.47) | 0.02 |
| Baseline HVR-1 dN/dS | 0 (0 to 0.325) | 0.28 (0 to 0.95) | 0.18 |
| Cumulative HVR-1 dN/dS (two samples taken <150 days apart) | 0.17 (0 to 0.35) | 1.02 (0.71 to 1.84) | 0.03 |
Significant p value<0.05.
dN/dS, non-synonymous substitutions per non-synonymous site divided by synonymous substitutions per synonymous site; FV, fluctuating viraemia; HVR-1, hypervariable region-1; PV, plateau viraemia.
Figure 3Patterns of acute HCV based on phylogenetic analysis in subjects 1–10. (A) Spontaneous clearance and plateau progression, (B) fluctuating viraemia associated with superinfection and (C) reactivation. A circular neighbour-joined phylogenetic tree analysis (Kimura 2-parameter model) of 305 HVR-1 sequences derived from subjects 1–10 at 2–4 time points is shown in order to illustrate patterns observed in different patient groups. Similar trees were created for 50 patients. Clones derived from each patient are given a different colour and those from two representative patients are shown in further detail (filled circles represent time point 1, clear circles time point 2, filled triangles time point 3 and clear triangles time point 4). (A) A gradual increase in genetic diversity can be seen in the progressor patient (black), while clones derived from the spontaneous clearer (red) reveal a narrower repertoire. Bootstrap values greater than 70% are shown. (B) A patient with evidence of superinfection is highlighted. Sequences from time point 4 (clear triangles, red brackets) consist of a dominant superinfecting strain (one clone related to the previous lineage is also present). This patient had a fluctuating viral load, with a negative HCV PCR (limit of detection=12 IU/ml) between time points 3 and 4. (C) A case of HCV reactivation is shown. The patient had a sustained virological response (PCR negative 6 months post-treatment) following 48 weeks of IFNα and ribavirin. One year later, he developed a rapid decrease in CD4 count (nadir 106x106/l) and was hospitalised with Pneumocystis jeroveci pneumonia. During this time, his ALT became elevated and HCV RNA was once again detected in his blood. He denied any risk factors for reacquisition of HCV. Branches derived from patient HVR-1 sequences (n=56) are coloured in filled green (baseline sample) and open green (3 years later). These samples derive from the same lineage.
Figure 5T cell responses across the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome at baseline and 3–6 months. (A) Total T cell responses and (B) T cell responses across the HCV genome. T cells responses to pooled peptides spanning the entire HCV genome were assessed by ELISpot in 40 patients with genotype 1a infection at two time points. Significant results (p<0.05) are highlighted with asterisks (red indicates significant difference between SC and both FV and PV patients; green indicates significant difference between SC and PV patients). These responses were measured in total (A) and to 10 overlapping peptide pools (B) from across the entire HCV genome.
Figure 4T cell responses and genetic variation within the E2 hypervariable region-1 (HVR-1) over time. Cumulative genetic variation (corrected Hamming distance and dN/dS ratio (non-synonymous substitutions per non-synonymous site divided by synonymous substitutions per synonymous site)) and T cell responses (interferon γ (IFNγ) spot-forming units (SFU)/106 cells) were assessed in each group of patients at two time points (sample 1, range 28–189 days; and sample 2, range 115–246 days from the last negative PCR test).