Literature DB >> 21138714

Impact of providing drinkers with "know your limit" information on drinking and driving: a field experiment.

Mark B Johnson1, John D Clapp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Given that most effective alcohol harm-reduction laws specify the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) that constitutes illegal behavior (e.g., the .08% breath alcohol concentration legal limit), interventions that allow drinkers to accurately estimate their BACs, and thus better assess their risk, have potential importance to long-term driving-under-the-influence prevention efforts. This study describes a field experiment designed to test the impact on drinking of providing "Know Your Limit" (KYL) BAC estimation cards to individuals in a natural drinking environment.
METHOD: We randomly sampled 1,215 U.S. residents as they entered Mexico for a night of drinking, interviewed them, and randomly assigned them to one of six experimental conditions. Participants were reinterviewed and breath-tested when they returned to the United States. The experimental conditions included providing generic warnings about drinking and driving, giving out gender-specific BAC calculator cards (KYL cards), and providing incentives to moderate their drinking.
RESULTS: Cueing participants about the risks of drunk driving resulted in significantly lower BACs (relative to control) for participants who indicated that they would drive home. Providing KYL matrixes did not reduce BACs, and, in fact, some evidence suggests that KYL cards undermined the effect of the warning.
CONCLUSIONS: KYL information does not appear to be an effective tool for reducing drinking and driving. Implications for prevention and future research are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21138714      PMCID: PMC3001683          DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs        ISSN: 1937-1888            Impact factor:   2.582


  11 in total

1.  Potential risks of providing drinking drivers with BAC information.

Authors:  Mark B Johnson; Robert B Voas
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.491

2.  The reliability of environmental measures of the college alcohol environment.

Authors:  John D Clapp; Mike Whitney; Audrey M Shillington
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  2002

3.  Drunk in public, drunk in private: the relationship between college students, drinking environments and alcohol consumption.

Authors:  J D Clapp; M B Reed; M R Holmes; J E Lange; R B Voas
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.829

4.  Drivers within natural drinking groups: an exploration of role selection, motivation, and group influence on driver sobriety.

Authors:  James E Lange; Mark B Johnson; Mark B Reed
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.829

5.  Portal surveys of time-out drinking locations: a tool for studying binge drinking and AOD use.

Authors:  Robert B Voas; Debra Furr-Holden; Elizabeth Lauer; Kristin Bright; Mark B Johnson; Brenda Miller
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2006-02

6.  Alcohol-related relative risk of driver fatalities and driver involvement in fatal crashes in relation to driver age and gender: an update using 1996 data.

Authors:  P L Zador; S A Krawchuk; R B Voas
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2000-05

7.  The efficacy of experimental interventions designed to reduce drinking among designated drivers.

Authors:  James E Lange; Mark B Reed; Mark B Johnson; Robert B Voas
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2006-03

8.  Evaluation of alcohol education programs on attitude, knowledge, and self-reported behavior of college students.

Authors:  L Sharmer
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Defining binge drinking quantities through resulting blood alcohol concentrations.

Authors:  J E Lange; R B Voas
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2001-12

10.  The consequences of providing drinkers with blood alcohol concentration information on assessments of alcohol impairment and drunk-driving risk.

Authors:  Mark B Johnson; Robert B Voas; Tara Kelley-Baker; C Debra M Furr-Holden
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.582

View more
  8 in total

1.  Preventing victimization among young women: The SafeNights intervention.

Authors:  Tara Kelley-Baker; Mark B Johnson; Eduardo Romano; Elizabeth A Mumford; Brenda A Miller
Journal:  Am J Health Stud       Date:  2011-01-01

2.  'Mama Don't Preach': Young Adults' Perceptions of Maternal Messages about Underage Drinking.

Authors:  Lucy E Napper; Laura C Wolter; Diana S Ebersole
Journal:  J Fam Commun       Date:  2020-02-06

3.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Self-Reported Number of Drinks in 2 Hours Before Driving Becomes Impaired.

Authors:  William C Kerr; Thomas K Greenfield
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Experimental test of social norms theory in a real-world drinking environment.

Authors:  Mark B Johnson
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.582

5.  Method of transportation and drinking among club patrons.

Authors:  Beth Bourdeau; Brenda A Miller; Mark B Johnson; Robert B Voas
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2015-07-01

6.  Clubbing With Familiar Social Groups: Relaxed Vigilance and Implications for Risk.

Authors:  Mark B Johnson; Robert Voas; Brenda Miller; Beth Bourdeau; Hilary Byrnes
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.582

7.  Driving decisions when leaving electronic music dance events: driver, passenger, and group effects.

Authors:  Mark B Johnson; Robert B Voas; Brenda A Miller
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.491

8.  Are Countries' Drink-Driving Policies Associated With Harms Involving Another Driver's Impairment?

Authors:  Thomas K Greenfield; Won K Cook; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; Libo Li; Robin Room
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.455

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.