Literature DB >> 21137090

Consistency of a two clinical site sample collection: a proteomics study.

Cedric Wiesner1, Charles Hannum, Karen Reckamp, Robert Figlin, Robert Dubridge, Sushmita Mimi Roy, Shanhua Lin, Christopher H Becker, Ted Jones, Jordan Hiller, John C Cheville, Keith Wilson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated the ability to perform a clinical proteomic study using samples collected at different times from two independent clinical sites. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Label-free 2-D-LC-MS proteomic analysis was used to differentially quantify tens of thousands of peptides from human plasma. We have asked whether samples collected from two sites, when analyzed by this type of peptide profiling, reproducibly contain detectable peptide markers that are differentially expressed in the plasma of disease (advanced renal cancer) patients relative to healthy normals.
RESULTS: We have demonstrated that plasma proteins enriched in disease patients are indeed detected reproducibly in both clinical collections. Regression analysis, unsupervised hierarchical clustering and PCA detected no systematic bias in the data related to site of sample collection and processing. Using a genetic algorithm, support vector machine classification method, we were able to correctly classify disease samples at 88% sensitivity and 94% specificity using the second site as an independent validation set. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We conclude that multiple site collection, when analyzed by label-free 2-D-LC-MS, generates data that are sufficiently reproducible to guide reliable biomarker discovery.
Copyright © 2010 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21137090     DOI: 10.1002/prca.200900206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl        ISSN: 1862-8346            Impact factor:   3.494


  2 in total

1.  Availability of MudPIT data for classification of biological samples.

Authors:  Dario Di Silvestre; Italo Zoppis; Francesca Brambilla; Valeria Bellettato; Giancarlo Mauri; Pierluigi Mauri
Journal:  J Clin Bioinforma       Date:  2013-01-14

Review 2.  Candidate Urine Peptide Biomarkers for IgA Nephropathy: Where Are We Now?

Authors:  Karolina Marek-Bukowiec; Andrzej Konieczny; Krzysztof Ratajczyk; Wojciech Witkiewicz
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 3.434

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.