Literature DB >> 21136754

Metrological sharp shooting for plasma proteins and peptides: The need for reference materials for accurate measurements in clinical proteomics and in vitro diagnostics to generate reliable results.

Frank Vitzthum1, Gérard Siest, David M Bunk, Tobias Preckel, Christian Wenz, Patric Hoerth, Peter Schulz-Knappe, Harald Tammen, Juergen Adamkiewicz, Giampaolo Merlini, N Leigh Anderson.   

Abstract

Reliable study results are necessary for the assessment of discoveries, including those from proteomics. Reliable study results are also crucial to increase the likelihood of making a successful choice of biomarker candidates for verification and subsequent validation studies, a current bottleneck for the transition to in vitro diagnostic (IVD). In this respect, a major need for improvement in proteomics appears to be accuracy of measurements, including both trueness and precision of measurement. Standardization and total quality management systems (TQMS) help to provide accurate measurements and reliable results. Reference materials are an essential part of standardization and TQMS in IVD and are crucial to provide metrological correct measurements and for the overall quality assurance process. In this article we give an overview on how reference materials are defined, prepared and what role they play in standardization and TQMS to support the generation of reliable results. We discuss how proteomics can support the establishment of reference materials and biomarker tests for IVD applications, how current reference materials used in IVD may be beneficially applied in proteomics, and we provide considerations on the establishment of reference materials specific for proteomics. For clarity, we solely focus on reference materials related to serum and plasma.
Copyright © 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21136754     DOI: 10.1002/prca.200700223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl        ISSN: 1862-8346            Impact factor:   3.494


  2 in total

1.  Survey of peptide quantification methods and comparison of their reproducibility: A case study using oxytocin.

Authors:  Chensheng Li; Sitaram Bhavaraju; Marie-Pier Thibeault; Jeremy Melanson; Andreas Blomgren; Torgny Rundlöf; Eric Kilpatrick; Carolyn J Swann; Timothy Rudd; Yves Aubin; Kevin Grant; Margaret Butt; WaiKei Shum; Tursun Kerim; William Sherwin; Yukari Nakagawa; Sergi Pavón; Silvia Arrastia; Tim Weel; Arunima Pola; Dinesh Chalasani; Steven Walfish; Fouad Atouf
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.935

2.  Interlaboratory study characterizing a yeast performance standard for benchmarking LC-MS platform performance.

Authors:  Amanda G Paulovich; Dean Billheimer; Amy-Joan L Ham; Lorenzo Vega-Montoto; Paul A Rudnick; David L Tabb; Pei Wang; Ronald K Blackman; David M Bunk; Helene L Cardasis; Karl R Clauser; Christopher R Kinsinger; Birgit Schilling; Tony J Tegeler; Asokan Mulayath Variyath; Mu Wang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Lisa J Zimmerman; David Fenyo; Steven A Carr; Susan J Fisher; Bradford W Gibson; Mehdi Mesri; Thomas A Neubert; Fred E Regnier; Henry Rodriguez; Cliff Spiegelman; Stephen E Stein; Paul Tempst; Daniel C Liebler
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 5.911

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.