Literature DB >> 21136567

A colorectal perspective on voluntary submission of outcome data to clinical registries.

A M Almoudaris1, E M Burns, A Bottle, P Aylin, A Darzi, O Faiz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to identify outcome differences amongst patients undergoing resection of colorectal cancer at English National Health Service trusts using Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). A comparison was undertaken of trusts that submitted and those that did not submit, or submitted only poorly, voluntarily to a colorectal clinical registry, the National Bowel Cancer Audit Programme (NBOCAP).
METHODS: The NBOCAP data set was used to classify trusts according to submitter status. HES data were used for outcome analysis. Data for major resections of colorectal cancer performed between 1 August 2007 and 31 July 2008 were obtained from HES. Trusts not submitting data to NBOCAP and those submitting less than 10 per cent of their total workload were termed 'non-submitters'. HES data for 30-day mortality, length of stay and readmission rates were compared according to submitter and non-submitter status in multifactorial analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 17,722 patients were identified from HES for inclusion. Unadjusted 30-day in-hospital mortality rates were higher in non-submitting than in submitting trusts (5·2 versus 4·0 per cent; P = 0·005). Submitter status was independently associated with reduced 30-day mortality (odds ratio 0·76, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·61 to 0·96; P = 0·021) in regression analysis.
CONCLUSION: A higher postoperative mortality rate following resection of colorectal cancer was found in trusts that do not voluntarily report data to NBOCAP. Implications regarding the voluntary nature of submission to such registries should be reviewed if they are to be used for outcome benchmarking.
Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21136567     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  8 in total

1.  The impact of shortened postgraduate surgical training on colorectal cancer outcome.

Authors:  A Currie; E M Burns; P Aylin; A Darzi; O D Faiz; P Ziprin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The role of caseload in determining outcome following laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: an observational study.

Authors:  Elaine M Burns; Ravikrishna Mamidanna; Andy Currie; Alex Bottle; Paul Aylin; Ara Darzi; Omar D Faiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Completeness and selection bias of a Belgian multidisciplinary, registration-based study on the EFFectiveness and quality of Endometrial Cancer Treatment (EFFECT).

Authors:  Joren Vanbraband; Nancy Van Damme; Gauthier Bouche; Geert Silversmit; Anke De Geyndt; Eric de Jonge; Gerd Jacomen; Frédéric Goffin; Hannelore Denys; Frédéric Amant
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Understanding how colorectal units achieve short length of stay: an interview survey among representative hospitals in England.

Authors:  Ben E Byrne; Anna Pinto; Paul Aylin; Alex Bottle; Omar D Faiz; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2015-01-23

5.  Short-term outcomes after emergency surgery for complicated peptic ulcer disease from the UK National Emergency Laparotomy Audit: a cohort study.

Authors:  Benjamin E Byrne; Michael Bassett; Chris A Rogers; Iain D Anderson; Ian Beckingham; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Variations and inter-relationship in outcome from emergency admissions in England: a retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics from 2005-2010.

Authors:  Peter James Edward Holt; Sidhartha Sinha; Baris Ata Ozdemir; Alan Karthikesalingam; Jan Dominik Poloniecki; Matt Merfyn Thompson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Population-based cohort study comparing 30- and 90-day institutional mortality rates after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  B E Byrne; R Mamidanna; C A Vincent; O Faiz
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Inequalities in Implementation and Different Outcomes During the Growth of Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery in England: A National Population-Based Study from 2002 to 2012.

Authors:  B E Byrne; C A Vincent; O D Faiz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.