Literature DB >> 2113650

A modified algorithm of the single pool urea kinetic model.

F G Casino1, C Basile, V Gaudiano, T Lopez.   

Abstract

Urea Kt/V, calculated according to the variable volume single pool urea kinetic model (UKM), has been accepted as the yardstick reflecting the adequacy of haemodialysis therapy. However, the classical algorithm of UKM requires great care in dialyser urea clearance (K) measurement in order to avoid major inaccuracies in estimating the urea distribution volume (V). Thus, we suggest a modified algorithm of UKM which avoids the measurement of K. It assumes an arbitrary V value and then calculates kinetically K as a function of the assumed V value. The rationale of the modified algorithm can be derived from the knowledge that the classical algorithm imposes a proportionality ration between K and V: given a particular set of data, a change in the attributed value of K leads to a proportional change in the calculated V value, so that the ratio K/V remains nearly constant. Aims of the study were (1) to validate the modified algorithm by comparing the resulting Kt/V and normalised protein catabolic rate (NPCR) values with the homologous ones obtained using the classical algorithm in a group of 33 patients on thrice-weekly haemodialysis; plasma water urea concentrations were used with the classical algorithm (CApw) and the modified algorithm (MApw); and (2) to verify the possibility of using plasma urea concentrations with the modified algorithm (MAp) instead of the more rigorous plasma water concentrations. NPCR (g/kg per day) was 1.33 +/- 0.05 in CApw, 1.29 +/- 0.05 in MApw and 1.28 +/- 0.04 in MAp. Kt/V was 1.27 +/- 0.03 in CApw, 1.25 +/- 0.03 in MApw and 1.26 +/- 0.03 in MAp.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2113650     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/5.3.214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  3 in total

Review 1.  Kt/V (and especially its modifications) remains a useful measure of hemodialysis dose.

Authors:  John T Daugirdas
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Dialysis dose scaled to body surface area and size-adjusted, sex-specific patient mortality.

Authors:  Sylvia Paz B Ramirez; Alissa Kapke; Friedrich K Port; Robert A Wolfe; Rajiv Saran; Jeffrey Pearson; Richard A Hirth; Joseph M Messana; John T Daugirdas
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  What volume to choose to assess online Kt/V?

Authors:  Francesco Gaetano Casino; Elena Mancini; Giovanni Santarsia; Salvatore Domenico Mostacci; Filomena D'Elia; Maria Di Carlo; Francesco Iannuzzella; Luigi Rossi; Luigi Vernaglione; Daniela Grimaldi; Renato Rapanà; Carlo Basile
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.902

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.