Literature DB >> 21136100

Information needs in operating room teams: what is right, what is wrong, and what is needed?

Helen W L Wong1, Damien Forrest, Andrew Healey, Hanieh Shirafkan, George B Hanna, Charles A Vincent, Nick Sevdalis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Safe surgical care requires effective information transfer between members of the operating room (OR) team. The present study aims to assess directly, systematically, and comprehensively, information needs of all OR team-members.
METHODS: Thirty-three OR team-members (16 surgeons/anesthesiologists, 17 nurses) took part in a mixed-method interview. Participants indicated what information they need, their problems accessing it, and potential interventions to improve information transfer. They also rated the importance of different sources of information and the quality (accuracy, availability, timeliness, completeness, and clarity) of the information that they typically receive. Theme extraction and statistical analyses (descriptive and inferential) were used to analyze the data.
RESULTS: The patient emerged as the top source of information. Surgeons and anesthesiologists relied more on information from fellow clinicians, as well as information originating from diagnostic and imaging labs. They were also more critical about the quality of the information than nursing personnel. Anesthesiologists emerged as the most reliable source of information, whereas information coming from surgeons was deemed lacking in quality (even by surgeons themselves). Finally, the more time participants had spent working in ORs, the more negative views they had about the information that they receive-an unexpected finding. Communication skills training, standardized communication protocols, and information technology (IT) systems to function as a central information repository were the top three proposed interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: This study comprehensively maps information sources, problems, and solutions expressed by OR end-users. Recent developments in skills training modules and patient safety interventions for the OR (Surgical Safety Checklist) are discussed as potential interventions that will ameliorate communication in ORs, with a view to enhance patient safety and surgical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21136100     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1486-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  29 in total

1.  Team communications in the operating room: talk patterns, sites of tension, and implications for novices.

Authors:  Lorelei Lingard; Richard Reznick; Sherry Espin; Glenn Regehr; Isabella DeVito
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  A systems approach to surgical safety.

Authors:  J F Calland; S Guerlain; R B Adams; C G Tribble; E Foley; E G Chekan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement.

Authors:  Charles Vincent; Krishna Moorthy; Sudip K Sarker; Avril Chang; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Distracting communications in the operating theatre.

Authors:  Nick Sevdalis; Andrew N Healey; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Training opportunities and the role of virtual reality simulation in acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Indran Balasundaram; Ara Darzi
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Managing intraoperative stress: what do surgeons want from a crisis training program?

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis; Debra Nestel; Tanya Tierney; Maria Woloshynowych; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Development, initial reliability and validity testing of an observational tool for assessing technical skills of operating room nurses.

Authors:  Nick Sevdalis; Shabnam Undre; Janet Henry; Elaine Sydney; Mary Koutantji; Ara Darzi; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 8.  The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis; Debra Nestel; Maria Woloshynowych; Ara Darzi; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Legitimation of nurses' knowledge through policies and protocols in clinical practice.

Authors:  E Manias; A Street
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  Teamwork and communication in surgical teams: implications for patient safety.

Authors:  Peter Mills; Julia Neily; Ed Dunn
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  4 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of intraoperative communication in open and laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Nick Sevdalis; Helen W L Wong; Sonal Arora; Kamal Nagpal; Andrew Healey; George B Hanna; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Ergonomics perspective for identifying and reducing internal operative flow disruption for laparoscopic urological surgery.

Authors:  Latif Al-Hakim; Jiaquan Xiao; Shomik Sengupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Information needs for the OR and PACU electronic medical record.

Authors:  V Herasevich; M A Ellsworth; J R Hebl; M J Brown; B W Pickering
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Application of a two-dimensional code video in neurosurgery device manipulation training for growing nurses in operating room.

Authors:  Min Liu; Xuan Li; Fei Yin; Chen Yi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.