| Literature DB >> 21135979 |
Abstract
Low-grade systemic inflammation is emerging as a component of the metabolic syndrome. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between serum C-reactive protein (CRP), physical activity and body composition in 193 black children aged 13 to 18 years from a South African township. Demographic information and anthropometric measurements were taken, and fasting blood samples were analysed for high-sensitivity serum CRP. Body fat was measured by air displacement plethysmography. There was a trend towards higher serum CRP in the boys with a higher percentage body fat. After multiple regression analyses, waist circumference in the girls was significantly associated with serum CRP. In the boys, there was an inverse correlation between percentage body fat and fitness, and between fitness and serum CRP. Significant differences were found between serum CRP in the different physical activity categories, with lower serum CRP in the girls in the higher physical activity group. Obesity should be prevented in South African children by encouraging physical activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21135979 PMCID: PMC3721782 DOI: 10.5830/cvja-2010-005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc J Afr ISSN: 1015-9657 Impact factor: 1.167
Descriptive Statistics Of Children Per Category Of Habitual Physical Activity (Mean ± SD/Median, Interquartile Range#)
| Girls | ||||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 59 | 20.43 ± 2.94 | 35 | 19.96 ± 3.60 | 10 | 20.22 ± 3.02 |
| Bleep test score | 58 | 3.27 ± 0.90 | 37 | 3.64 ± 1.31 | 9 | 4.47 ± 0.93 |
| CRP (mg/l)# | 58 | 0.33 (0.15–0.94) | 38 | 0.46 (0.26–1.75) | 10 | 0.22 (0.21–0.26) |
| WC (cm) | 60 | 64.54 ± 5.90 | 38 | 63.82 ± 6.42 | 10 | 63.35 ± 4.13 |
| TSF (mm) | 60 | 16.60 ± 5.91 | 38 | 14.50 ± 4.47 | 10 | 14.12 ± 5.13 |
| Boys | ||||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 18 | 19.35 ± 2.58 | 34 | 18.56 ± 2.43 | 23 | 19.51 ± 2.92 |
| Bleep test score | 18 | 6.43 ± 2.49 | 33 | 6.2 ± 1.75 | 23 | 7.00 ± 1.91 |
| CRP (mg/l)# | 17 | 0.19 (0.15–0.38) | 32 | 0.59 (0.28–1.06) | 21 | 0.31 (0.16–0.95) |
| WC (cm) | 18 | 66.42 ± 4.95 | 33 | 64.81 ± 5.90 | 22 | 66.41 ± 5.60 |
| TSF (mm) | 18 | 9.12 ± 4.09 | 33 | 8.41 ± 4.11 | 22 | 9.36 ± 4.94 |
BMI: body mass index; CRP: C-reactive protein; WC: waist circumference; TSF: triceps skin fold. *Number of subjects differs due to missing data.
Pearson Partial Correlations For Boys And Girls Adjusted For Age And Smoking
| n | p | n | p | |||
| BMI and log CRP | 0.01 | 72* | NS | 0.21 | 112 | 0.04 |
| Waist circumference and log CRP | –0.03 | 69 | NS | 0.22 | 112 | 0.03 |
| Triceps skin fold and log CRP | 0.10 | 69 | NS | 0.15 | 112 | NS |
| Sub-scapular skin fold and log CRP | 0.16 | 69 | NS | 0.20 | 112 | 0.05 |
| Supra-spinal skin fold and log CRP | 0.12 | 69 | NS | 0.28 | 112 | 0.004 |
| Abdominal skin fold and log CRP | 0.13 | 66 | NS | 0.21 | 112 | 0.03 |
| Body fat percentage and log CRP | 0.16 | 53 | NS | 0.14 | 106 | NS |
| Bleep test laps completed and log CRP | –0.30 | 71 | 0.012 | –0.15 | 109 | NS |
| Bleep test laps completed and PDPAR score | 0.06 | 112 | NS | 0.22 | 131 | 0.01 |
| Bleep test laps completed and body fat percentage | –0.26 | 81 | 0.02 | –0.33 | 128 | < 0.0001 |
*Number of subjects differs due to missing data.
Descriptive Statistics For Girls With High Body Fat Percentage Versus Girls With Normal Body Fat Percentage
| Age (years) | 15.43 | 1.24 | 15.55 | 1.41 |
| Weight (kg)# | 43.98 | 5.88 | 51.80 | 8.52 |
| Height (cm) | 155.6 | 0.04 | 155.0 | 6.67 |
| BMI (kg/m2)# | 18.12 | 2.11 | 21.53 | 3.09 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 60.55 | 4.24 | 66.28 | 5.78 |
| WHR | 0.75 | 0.04 | 0.76 | 0.05 |
| Triceps skin fold (mm)# | 10.99 | 3.87 | 18.11 | 5.93 |
| Sub-scapular skin fold (mm)# | 9.00 | 2.95 | 13.99 | 5.51 |
| Abdominal skin fold (mm)# | 12.82 | 4.15 | 22.09 | 7.11 |
| Fat %# | 20.60 | 4.64 | 32.06 | 4.74 |
| Muscle mass (kg) | 33.57 | 5.16 | 34.66 | 5.28 |
| Tanner stage 1* (14 years) | 2 | 5.7% | 0 | 0 |
| Tanner stage 2* (14.4 ± 0.6, 13–15 years) | 5 | 14.3% | 5 | 4.9% |
| Tanner stage 3* (15.2 ± 1.2, 14–17 years) | 10 | 28.6% | 46 | 45.5% |
| Tanner stage 4* (15.7 ± 1.2, 14–18 years) | 16 | 45.7% | 43 | 42.6% |
| Tanner stage 5* (16.6 ± 1.4, 15–18 years) | 2 | 5.7% | 7 | 6.9% |
| Serum CRP (mg/l) | 0.30 | 0.15–0.91 | 0.34 | 0.20–1.23 |
Differentiated on account of fat percentage, girls with fat percentages > 25% were classified over-fat, according to Lohman.28
*Tanner stage based on breast/genital development stage (1 = no development, 5 = mature)21 with age, mean ± SD (range), #significant differences between groups. BMI: body mass index; CRP: serum C-reactive protein concentration; WC: waist circumference; TSF: triceps skin fold.
Descriptive Statistics For Boys With High Body Fat Percentage Versus Boys With Normal Body Fat Percentage
| Age (years) | 15.88 | 1.56 | 15.65 | 1.44 |
| Weight (kg)# | 47.96 | 8.55 | 53.80 | 14.46 |
| Height (cm) | 161.31 | 8.66 | 159.51 | 10.30 |
| BMI (kg/m2)# | 18.32 | 2.28 | 20.87 | 3.69 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 65.11 | 4.94 | 69.60 | 7.12 |
| WHR | 0.84 | 0.06 | 0.83 | 0.04 |
| Triceps skin fold (mm)# | 7.74 | 2.60 | 14.14 | 6.28 |
| Sub-scapular skin fold (mm)# | 7.18 | 1.82 | 12.20 | 8.18 |
| Abdominal skin fold (mm)# | 9.50 | 4.33 | 21.32 | 11.01 |
| Fat %# | 16.16 | 4.21 | 29.62 | 4.23 |
| Muscle mass (kg) | 40.45 | 7.49 | 37.99 | 10.50 |
| Tanner stage 1* (–) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tanner stage 2* (14.9 ± 0.7, 13–15 years) | 6 | 8.6% | 1 | 6.7% |
| Tanner stage 3* (15.0 ± 1.2, 13–17 years) | 14 | 20% | 4 | 26.6% |
| Tanner stage 4* (16.0 ± 1.3, 14–18 years) | 44 | 62.8% | 9 | 60% |
| Tanner stage 5* (16.8 ± 1.0, 15–18 years) | 6 | 8.6% | 1 | 6.7% |
| CRP (mg/l) | 0.39 | 0.15–0.90 | 0.59 | 0.20–1.65 |
Differentiated on account of fat percentage, boys with fat percentages > 20% were classified over- fat, according to Lohman.28
*Tanner stage based on genital development stage (1 = no development, 5 = mature)21 with age, mean ± SD (range), #significant differences between groups. BMI: body mass index; CRP: serum C-reactive protein concentration; WC: waist circumference; TSF: triceps skin fold.
Differences Between Anthropometric Variables And Correlation Between Percentage Body Fat And Anthropometric Variables In Boys And Girls With A High Body Fat Percentage Versus Boys And Girls With A Normal Body Fat Percentage
| Correlation coefficient (level of significance) for the correlation between percentage body fat and skin-fold thickness | ||||
| Triceps skin fold (mm) | 0.16 (NS) | 0.63 ( | 0.33 (NS) | 0.63 ( |
| Sub-scapular (mm) | –0.03 (NS) | 0.67 ( | 0.25 (NS) | 0.67 ( |
| Abdominal (mm) | 0.28 ( | 0.68 ( | 0.37 ( | 0.68 ( |
| Percentage difference between groups of boys and girls | ||||
| Body weight (kg) | 12.13% | 17.78% | ||
| Waist circumference (mm) | 6.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Percentage body fat | 83.3% | 55.6% | ||