OBJECTIVE: To review mesh products currently available for ventral hernia repair and to evaluate their efficacy in complex repair, including contaminated and reoperative fields. BACKGROUND: Although commonly referenced, the concept of the ideal prosthetic has never been fully realized. With the development of newer prosthetics and approaches to the ventral hernia repair, many surgeons do not fully understand the properties of the available prosthetics or the circumstances that warrant the use of a specific mesh. METHODS: A systematic review of published literature from 1951 to June of 2009 was conducted to identify articles relating to ventral hernia repairs and the use of prosthetics in herniorrhaphy. RESULTS: Important differences exist between the synthetics, composites, and biologic prosthetics used for ventral hernia repair in terms of mechanics, cost, and the ideal situation in which each should be used. CONCLUSIONS: The use of synthetic mesh remains an appropriate solution for most ventral hernia repairs. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair has created a niche for both expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and composite mesh, as they are suited to intraperitoneal placement. Preliminary studies have demonstrated that the newer biologic prosthetics are reasonable options for hernia repair in contaminated fields and for large abdominal wall defects; however, more studies need to be done before advocating the use of these biologics in other settings.
OBJECTIVE: To review mesh products currently available for ventral hernia repair and to evaluate their efficacy in complex repair, including contaminated and reoperative fields. BACKGROUND: Although commonly referenced, the concept of the ideal prosthetic has never been fully realized. With the development of newer prosthetics and approaches to the ventral hernia repair, many surgeons do not fully understand the properties of the available prosthetics or the circumstances that warrant the use of a specific mesh. METHODS: A systematic review of published literature from 1951 to June of 2009 was conducted to identify articles relating to ventral hernia repairs and the use of prosthetics in herniorrhaphy. RESULTS: Important differences exist between the synthetics, composites, and biologic prosthetics used for ventral hernia repair in terms of mechanics, cost, and the ideal situation in which each should be used. CONCLUSIONS: The use of synthetic mesh remains an appropriate solution for most ventral hernia repairs. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair has created a niche for both expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and composite mesh, as they are suited to intraperitoneal placement. Preliminary studies have demonstrated that the newer biologic prosthetics are reasonable options for hernia repair in contaminated fields and for large abdominal wall defects; however, more studies need to be done before advocating the use of these biologics in other settings.
Authors: B P Müller-Stich; J D Senft; F Lasitschka; M Shevchenko; A T Billeter; T Bruckner; H G Kenngott; L Fischer; T Gehrig Journal: Hernia Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: S Levy; D Moszkowicz; T Poghosyan; A Beauchet; M -M Chandeze; K Vychnevskaia; F Peschaud; J -L Bouillot Journal: Hernia Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Kevin W Y van Barneveld; Ruben R M Vogels; Geerard L Beets; Stephanie O Breukink; Jan-Willem M Greve; Nicole D Bouvy; Marc H F Schreinemacher Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-12-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Lawrence Lee; Juan Mata; Tara Landry; Kosar A Khwaja; Melina C Vassiliou; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: William C Cole; Eric M Balent; Pamela C Masella; Lauren N Kajiura; Karen W Matsumoto; Lisa M Pierce Journal: Hernia Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 4.739