Literature DB >> 21135295

For-profit hospital status and rehospitalizations at different hospitals: an analysis of Medicare data.

Amy J H Kind1, Christie Bartels, Matthew W Mell, John Mullahy, Maureen Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: About one quarter of rehospitalized Medicare patients are admitted to hospitals different from their original hospital. The extent to which this practice is related to for-profit hospital status and affects payments and mortality is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To describe and examine predictors of and payments for rehospitalization at a different hospital among Medicare patients rehospitalized within 30 days at for-profit and nonprofit or public hospitals.
DESIGN: Cohort study of patients discharged and rehospitalized from January 2005 to November 2006.
SETTING: Medicare fee-for-service hospitals throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A 5% random national sample of Medicare patients with acute care rehospitalizations within 30 days of discharge (n = 74,564). MEASUREMENTS: 30-day rehospitalizations at different hospitals and total payments or mortality over the subsequent 30 days. Multivariate logistic and quantile regression models included index hospital for-profit status, discharge counts, geographic region, rural-urban commuting area, and teaching status; patient sociodemographic characteristics, disability status, and comorbid conditions; and a measure of risk adjustment.
RESULTS: 16 622 patients (22%) in the sample were rehospitalized at a different hospital. Factors associated with increased risk for rehospitalization at a different hospital included index hospitalization at a for-profit, major medical school-affiliated, or low-volume hospital and having a Medicare-defined disability. Compared with patients rehospitalized at the same hospital, patients rehospitalized at different hospitals had higher adjusted 30-day total payments (median additional cost, $1308 per patient; P < 0.001) but no statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality, regardless of index hospital for-profit status. LIMITATION: The database lacked detailed clinical information about patients and did not include information about specific provider practice motivations or the role of patient choice in hospitalization venues.
CONCLUSION: Rehospitalizations at different hospitals are common among Medicare patients, are more likely among those initially hospitalized at a for-profit hospital, and are related to increased overall payments without improved mortality. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: University of Wisconsin Hartford Center of Excellence in Geriatrics, National Institutes of Health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21135295      PMCID: PMC3058683          DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-11-201012070-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  35 in total

1.  Volume thresholds and hospital characteristics in the United States.

Authors:  Anne Elixhauser; Claudia Steiner; Irene Fraser
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Federal health information policy: a case of arrested development.

Authors:  Jeff Goldsmith; David Blumenthal; Wes Rishel
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Emergency department overcrowding in the United States: an emerging threat to patient safety and public health.

Authors:  S Trzeciak; E P Rivers
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship.

Authors:  Kevin G Billingsley; Arden M Morris; Jason A Dominitz; Barbara Matthews; Sharon Dobie; William Barlow; George E Wright; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2007-01

5.  Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression.

Authors:  A Russell Localio; David J Margolis; Jesse A Berlin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Interpreting market share changes as evidence for effectiveness of quality report cards.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; David L Weimer; Alvin I Mushlin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Are patients being transferred to level-I trauma centers for reasons other than medical necessity?

Authors:  Kenneth J Koval; Chad W Tingey; Kevin F Spratt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care.

Authors:  Sunil Kripalani; Frank LeFevre; Christopher O Phillips; Mark V Williams; Preetha Basaviah; David W Baker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The influence of insurance status on the transfer of femoral fracture patients to a level-I trauma center.

Authors:  Michael T Archdeacon; Patrick M Simon; John D Wyrick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Bouncing back: patterns and predictors of complicated transitions 30 days after hospitalization for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Amy J H Kind; Maureen A Smith; Jennifer R Frytak; Michael D Finch
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  24 in total

1.  Association between elder self-neglect and hospice utilization in a community population.

Authors:  XinQi Dong; Melissa A Simon
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  The Quality of Surgical and Pneumonia Care in Minority-Serving and Racially Integrated Hospitals.

Authors:  Darrell J Gaskin; Hossein Zare; Adil H Haider; Thomas A LaVeist
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Superior outcomes for rural patients after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair supports a systematic regional approach to abdominal aortic aneurysm care.

Authors:  Matthew W Mell; Christie Bartels; Amy Kind; Glen Leverson; Maureen Smith
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Postdischarge complications are an important predictor of postoperative readmissions.

Authors:  Sarah E Tevis; Brittney M Kohlnhofer; Sharon M Weber; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  The Care Transitions Measure-3 Is Only Weakly Associated with Post-discharge Outcomes: a Retrospective Cohort Study in 48,384 Albertans.

Authors:  Finlay A McAlister; Mu Lin; Jeff Bakal; Kyle A Kemp; Hude Quan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Cohort study of risk factors for 30-day readmission after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Jonathan Bath; Jamie B Smith; Robin L Kruse; Todd R Vogel
Journal:  Vasa       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 1.961

7.  Predictors and outcomes of unplanned readmission to a different hospital.

Authors:  Hongsoo Kim; William W Hung; Myunghee Cho Paik; Joseph S Ross; Zhonglin Zhao; Gi-Soo Kim; Kenneth Boockvar
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Reducing excess hospital readmissions: Does destination matter?

Authors:  Min Chen
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2017-09-26

9.  Medicare Star excludes diabetes patients with poor CVD risk factor control.

Authors:  Julie Schmittdiel; Marsha Raebel; Wendy Dyer; John Steiner; Glenn Goodrich; Andy Karter; Gregory Nichols
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Causes and implications of readmission after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  David Yu Greenblatt; Caprice C Greenberg; Amy J H Kind; Jeffrey A Havlena; Matthew W Mell; Matthew T Nelson; Maureen A Smith; K Craig Kent
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.