Literature DB >> 21135263

A retrospective clinical study of 188 consecutive patients to examine the effectiveness of a biologically active cryopreserved human skin allograft (TheraSkin®) on the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers.

Adam Scott Landsman1, Jeremy Cook, Emily Cook, Arnold Robert Landsman, Philip Garrett, Joonhyun Yoon, Alfred Kirkwood, Eric Desman.   

Abstract

A biologically active human skin allograft, currently distributed under the brand name TheraSkin(®), was examined for safety and efficacy in the treatment of venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The objective was to determine if TheraSkin could serve as a safe and effective alternative to bioengineered skin substitutes such as Apligraf(®) and Dermagraft(®). The authors conducted a retrospective study of 214 consecutive patients seen at the Inova Wound Center (Mt Vernon, Virginia), with either a DFU or a VLU. After excluding patients who did not meet the study criteria, the final eligible cohort consisted of 188 subjects, with 134 VLUs and 54 DFUs. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between baseline wound size and the proportion of healed wounds after 12 and 20 weeks from initial allograft application. The authors found that by the 12th week, DFUs closed 60.38% of the time and VLUs closed 60.77% of the time. After 20 weeks, the number of closed DFUs increased to 74.1% and the number of VLUs increased to 74.6%. The mean wound size in the DFU group was 6.2 cm(2) (±11.8) and 11.8 cm(2) (±22.5) in the VLU group. The mean number of TheraSkin allografts required ranged from 1 to 8, with an average of 2.03 (±1.47) at the 12-week point and an average of 3.23 (±2.77) at the 20-week point. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the odds of wound healing by week 12 and week 20 in each group. The authors also analyzed adverse events and found TheraSkin to be noncontributory to any adverse events, verifying the safety of TheraSkin in this study population. In this study, TheraSkin has been shown to be highly effective for the treatment of both VLUs and DFUs with an acceptable safety profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21135263     DOI: 10.1177/1938640010387417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Spec        ISSN: 1938-6400


  14 in total

Review 1.  An update and review of cell-based wound dressings and their integration into clinical practice.

Authors:  Austin Pourmoussa; Daniel J Gardner; Maxwell B Johnson; Alex K Wong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  Biomaterials to Mimic and Heal Connective Tissues.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; David J Mooney
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 3.  Comparison of Skin Substitutes for Acute and Chronic Wound Management.

Authors:  Caroline Bay; Zachary Chizmar; Edward M Reece; Jessie Z Yu; Julian Winocour; Joshua Vorstenbosch; Sebastian Winocour
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 2.195

4.  The Health Economic Impact of Living Cell Tissue Products in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds: A Retrospective Analysis of Medicare Claims Data.

Authors:  Adrian Barbul; Helen Gelly; Arti Masturzo
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Skin tissue regeneration for burn injury.

Authors:  Anastasia Shpichka; Denis Butnaru; Evgeny A Bezrukov; Roman B Sukhanov; Anthony Atala; Vitaliy Burdukovskii; Yuanyuan Zhang; Peter Timashev
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 6.  Challenges in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds.

Authors:  Robert G Frykberg; Jaminelli Banks
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Engineered Biopolymeric Scaffolds for Chronic Wound Healing.

Authors:  Laura E Dickinson; Sharon Gerecht
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Comparative Effectiveness of a Bioengineered Living Cellular Construct and Cryopreserved Cadaveric Skin Allograft for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers in a Real-World Setting.

Authors:  Terry Treadwell; Michael L Sabolinski; Michelle Skornicki; Nathan B Parsons
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Matched-cohort study comparing bioactive human split-thickness skin allograft plus standard of care to standard of care alone in the treatment of diabetic ulcers: A retrospective analysis across 470 institutions.

Authors:  Adrian Barbul; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Hanna Gordon; Katie Bakewell; Marissa J Carter
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.617

10.  An open-label trial of cryopreserved human umbilical cord in the treatment of complex diabetic foot ulcers complicated by osteomyelitis.

Authors:  William A Marston; John C Lantis; Stephanie C Wu; Aksone Nouvong; Tommy D Lee; Nicholas D McCoy; Herbert B Slade; Scheffer C Tseng
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.