Literature DB >> 21135029

Optimal allocation of resources in response to shading and neighbours in the heteroblastic species, Acacia implexa.

Michael A Forster1, Brenton Ladd, Stephen P Bonser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Heteroblasty is an encompassing term referring to ontogenetic changes in the plant shoot. A shaded environment is known to affect the process of heteroblastic development; however, it is not known whether crowded or high density growing conditions can also alter heteroblasty. Compound leaves of the shade-intolerant Acacia implexa allocate less biomass per unit photosynthetic area than transitional leaves or phyllodes and it is hypothesized that this trait will convey an advantage in a crowded environment. Compound leaves also have larger photosynthetic capture area - a trait known to be advantageous in shade. This studied tested the hypothesis that more compound leaves will be developed under shade and crowded environments. Furthermore, this species should undergo optimal allocation of biomass to shoots and roots given shaded and crowded environments.
METHODS: A full factorial design of irradiance (high and low) and density levels (high, medium and low) on three populations sourced from varying rainfall regions (high, medium and low) was established under controlled glasshouse conditions. Traits measured include the number of nodes expressing a compound leaf, biomass allocation to shoots and roots, and growth traits. Key Results A higher number of nodes expressed a compound leaf under low irradiance and in high density treatments; however, there were no significant interactions across treatments. Phenotypes strongly associated with the shade avoidance syndrome were developed under low irradiance; however, this was not observed under high density. There was no significant difference in relative growth rates across light treatments, but growth was significantly slower in a crowded environment. Conclusions Heteroblastic development in Acacia can be altered by shade and crowded environments. In this experiment, light was clearly the most limiting factor to growth in a shaded environment; however, in a crowded environment there were additional limiting resources to growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21135029      PMCID: PMC3025730          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  11 in total

1.  An Essay on Juvenility, Phase Change, and Heteroblasty in Seed Plants.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Plant Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.785

2.  Keeping up with the neighbours: phytochrome sensing and other signalling mechanisms.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 18.313

3.  Construction costs, chemical composition and payback time of high- and low-irradiance leaves.

Authors:  Hendrik Poorter; Steeve Pepin; Toon Rijkers; Yvonne de Jong; John R Evans; Christian Körner
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 4.  Phytochromes and shade-avoidance responses in plants.

Authors:  Keara A Franklin; Garry C Whitelam
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity.

Authors:  Fernando Valladares; Ernesto Gianoli; José M Gómez
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Heteroblastic development and the optimal partitioning of traits among contrasting environments in Acacia implexa.

Authors:  Michael A Forster; Stephen P Bonser
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Light spectral quality, phytochrome and plant competition.

Authors:  J Schmitt; R D Wulff
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Asymmetric competition in plant populations.

Authors:  J Weiner
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Influence of light availability on leaf structure and growth of two Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus provenances.

Authors:  S A James; D T Bell
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.196

10.  Growth form evolution and shifting habitat specialization in annual plants.

Authors:  S P Bonser; M A Geber
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.411

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessing the reproducibility of discriminant function analyses.

Authors:  Rose L Andrew; Arianne Y K Albert; Sebastien Renaut; Diana J Rennison; Dan G Bock; Tim Vines
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Shade and nutrient-mediated phenotypic plasticity in the miracle plant Synsepalum dulcificum (Schumach. & Thonn.) Daniell.

Authors:  Dèdéou A Tchokponhoué; Sognigbé N'Danikou; Jacob S Houéto; Enoch G Achigan-Dako
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  PHOTOPERIOD RESPONSE 1 (PHOR1)-like genes regulate shoot/root growth, starch accumulation, and wood formation in Populus.

Authors:  Christine Zawaski; Cathleen Ma; Steven H Strauss; Darla French; Richard Meilan; Victor B Busov
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 6.992

4.  Root morphological responses to population density vary with soil conditions and growth stages: The complexity of density effects.

Authors:  Shu Wang; Lei Li; Dao-Wei Zhou
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.