Literature DB >> 21134929

Differences between integrated and stand-alone E-prescribing systems have implications for future use.

Catherine M Desroches1, Ritu Agarwal, Corey M Angst, Michael A Fischer.   

Abstract

Understanding the benefits of electronic prescribing systems has important implications for quality and efficiency in medical care. We surveyed physicians about their use of e-prescribing in outpatient practices. We found that physicians who use e-prescribing systems integrated into an electronic health record have different characteristics, usage patterns, perceived benefits, and levels of satisfaction than physicians who use stand-alone systems. For example, although only 56 percent of the physicians we surveyed said that they checked a patient's drug history most or all of the time when writing a prescription, those with integrated systems were significantly more likely to report doing so than their counterparts with stand-alone systems. Our findings have implications for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act's requirements for e-prescribing and the future use of this technology. Because many stand-alone systems cannot meet meaningful-use requirements, there is likely to be a shift toward integrated systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21134929     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  9 in total

Review 1.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic prescription: a systematic review of user groups' perceptions.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Édith-Romy Nsangou; Julie Payne-Gagnon; Sonya Grenier; Claude Sicotte
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Electronic prescribing: improving the efficiency and accuracy of prescribing in the ambulatory care setting.

Authors:  Amber Porterfield; Kate Engelbert; Alberto Coustasse
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2014-04-01

3.  Effect of Electronic Prescribing Compared to Paper-Based (Handwritten) Prescribing on Primary Medication Adherence in an Outpatient Setting: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David Aluga; Lawrence A Nnyanzi; Nicola King; Elvis A Okolie; Peter Raby
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.762

4.  Assessing organizational capacity for achieving meaningful use of electronic health records.

Authors:  Christopher M Shea; Robb Malone; Morris Weinberger; Kristin L Reiter; Jonathan Thornhill; Jennifer Lord; Nicholas G Nguyen; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Computerized prescriber order entry in the outpatient oncology setting: from evidence to meaningful use.

Authors:  V Kukreti; R Cosby; A Cheung; S Lankshear
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Effectiveness of an electronic health record-based intervention to improve follow-up of abnormal pathology results: a retrospective record analysis.

Authors:  Archana Laxmisan; Dean F Sittig; Kenneth Pietz; Donna Espadas; Bhuvaneswari Krishnan; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Transmitting and processing electronic prescriptions: experiences of physician practices and pharmacies.

Authors:  Joy M Grossman; Dori A Cross; Ellyn R Boukus; Genna R Cohen
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Impact of Early Electronic Prescribing on Pharmacists' Clarification Calls in Four Community Pharmacies Located in St John's, Newfoundland.

Authors:  Jennifer L Phillips; Jennifer M Shea; Valerie Leung; Don MacDonald
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2015-01-06

9.  User-centered design and usability testing of RxMAGIC: a prescription management and general inventory control system for free clinic dispensaries.

Authors:  Arielle M Fisher; Timothy M Mtonga; Jeremy U Espino; Lauren J Jonkman; Sharon E Connor; Nickie K Cappella; Gerald P Douglas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.