Literature DB >> 21134766

Tissue and serum biomarkers as prognostic variables in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer.

Angiolo Gadducci1, Stefania Cosio, Andrea Riccardo Genazzani.   

Abstract

FIGO stage, tumor grade, depth of myometrial invasion, lymph-vascular space status and lymph node status are the most important clinical-pathological prognostic variables for endometrioid-type endometrial carcinoma. In the last years, several investigations have assessed different biological variables in tissue and serum samples from patients with this malignancy in order to detect biomarkers able to predict the clinical outcome. The present paper reviewed the literature data about the prognostic relevance of mutational status and/or immunohistochemical expression of p53, PTEN, PIK3, mTOR, β-catenin, k-ras and RASSF1A, microsatellite instability, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, DNA aneuploidy, and serum assay of CA125 and other tumor associated antigens. Tissue and serum biomarkers could be used, in addition to the conventional clinical-pathological variables, for the stratification of patients into categories with different risk of recurrence to better tailor adjuvant treatment.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21134766     DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  7 in total

1.  Prognostic value of cyclin B in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Simi Santala; Anne Talvensaari-Mattila; Ylermi Soini; Markku Santala
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-10-15

Review 2.  Endometrial cancer with congenital uterine anomalies: 3 case reports and a literature review.

Authors:  Jinping Gao; Jintian Zhang; Wenyan Tian; Fei Teng; Huiying Zhang; Xuhong Zhang; Yingmei Wang; Fengxia Xue
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 3.  The Role of CTNNB1 in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Živa Ledinek; Monika Sobočan; Jure Knez
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Overexpression of peroxiredoxin-3 and -5 is a potential biomarker for prognosis in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jung Mi Byun; Su Sun Kim; Ki Tae Kim; Mi Seon Kang; Dae Hoon Jeong; Dae Sim Lee; Eun Jung Jung; Young Nam Kim; Jin Han; In Sung Song; Kyoun Bok Lee; Moon Su Sung
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Candidate biomarkers for genetic and clinicopathological diagnosis of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Kouji Banno; Yuya Nogami; Iori Kisu; Megumi Yanokura; Kiyoko Umene; Kenta Masuda; Yusuke Kobayashi; Wataru Yamagami; Nobuyuki Susumu; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Progesterone Receptor Membrane Component (PGRMC)1 and PGRMC2 and Their Roles in Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  John J Peluso; James K Pru
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  S100 expression in dendritic cells is inversely correlated with tumor grade in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Young Joo Lee; Sun Young Kang; Moo Sung Jo; Dong Soo Suh; Ki Hyung Kim; Man Soo Yoon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2014-05-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.