Literature DB >> 21134705

Health sector decentralization and local decision-making: Decision space, institutional capacities and accountability in Pakistan.

Thomas John Bossert1, Andrew David Mitchell.   

Abstract

Health sector decentralization has been widely adopted to improve delivery of health services. While many argue that institutional capacities and mechanisms of accountability required to transform decentralized decision-making into improvements in local health systems are lacking, few empirical studies exist which measure or relate together these concepts. Based on research instruments administered to a sample of 91 health sector decision-makers in 17 districts of Pakistan, this study analyzes relationships between three dimensions of decentralization: decentralized authority (referred to as "decision space"), institutional capacities, and accountability to local officials. Composite quantitative indicators of these three dimensions were constructed within four broad health functions (strategic and operational planning, budgeting, human resources management, and service organization/delivery) and on an overall/cross-function basis. Three main findings emerged. First, district-level respondents report varying degrees of each dimension despite being under a single decentralization regime and facing similar rules across provinces. Second, within dimensions of decentralization-particularly decision space and capacities-synergies exist between levels reported by respondents in one function and those reported in other functions (statistically significant coefficients of correlation ranging from ρ=0.22 to ρ=0.43). Third, synergies exist across dimensions of decentralization, particularly in terms of an overall indicator of institutional capacities (significantly correlated with both overall decision space (ρ=0.39) and accountability (ρ=0.23)). This study demonstrates that decentralization is a varied experience-with some district-level officials making greater use of decision space than others and that those who do so also tend to have more capacity to make decisions and are held more accountable to elected local officials for such choices. These findings suggest that Pakistan's decentralization policy should focus on synergies among dimensions of decentralization to encouraging more use of de jure decision space, work toward more uniform institutional capacity, and encourage greater accountability to local elected officials.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21134705     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  40 in total

1.  Decision Space and Capacities in the Decentralization of Health Services in FijiComment on "Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis".

Authors:  Thomas J Bossert
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-07-01

Review 2.  Does Decentralization Improve Health System Performance and Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Systematic Review of Evidence From Quantitative Studies.

Authors:  Adenantera Dwicaksono; Ashley M Fox
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis.

Authors:  Jalal Mohammed; Nicola North; Toni Ashton
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-11-15

4.  Does HIV services decentralization protect against the risk of catastrophic health expenditures?: some lessons from Cameroon.

Authors:  Sylvie Boyer; Mohammad Abu-Zaineh; Jérôme Blanche; Sandrine Loubière; Renée-Cécile Bonono; Jean-Paul Moatti; Bruno Ventelou
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 5.  Review of HIV response in Pakistan using a system thinking framework.

Authors:  Muhammad Ahmed Abdullah; Babar Tasneem Shaikh
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 6.  Resources, attitudes and culture: an understanding of the factors that influence the functioning of accountability mechanisms in primary health care settings.

Authors:  Susan M Cleary; Sassy Molyneux; Lucy Gilson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Evaluation of capacity-building program of district health managers in India: a contextualized theoretical framework.

Authors:  N S Prashanth; Bruno Marchal; Guy Kegels; Bart Criel
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2014-07-25

8.  A scoping review of public hospitals autonomy in Iran: from budgetary hospitals to corporate hospitals.

Authors:  Rahim Sohrabi; Sogand Tourani; Mehdi Jafari; Hossein Joudaki; Leila Doshmangir; Javad Moghri; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Management of human resources for health in health districts in Uganda: A decision space analysis.

Authors:  Wesam Mansour; Adelaine Aryaija-Karemani; Tim Martineau; Justine Namakula; Paul Mubiri; Freddie Ssengooba; Joanna Raven
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2021-10-25

10.  Localization of health systems in low- and middle-income countries in response to long-term increases in energy prices.

Authors:  Sarah L Dalglish; Melissa N Poulsen; Peter J Winch
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.