BACKGROUND: Treatment options for secondary hyperparathyroidism were significantly amended with the introduction of cinacalcet and paricalcitol. Limitations of resources in public health systems demand detailed analyses of accruing costs. The aim of this study was to compare the costs of these new treatment modalities to surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent initial parathyroidectomy (n = 91) and patients treated with cinacalcet or paricalcitol (n = 100) at an ambulatory dialysis center between 01/2003 and 12/2006 were analyzed. The revenues of both therapies for the funding agencies were calculated by a cost-cost analysis. The real arising costs of the supplier were analyzed and compared to the revenues. RESULTS: Treatment costs for cinacalcet (60 mg/day/year) were 5828.40€ and 4485.20€ for paricalcitol (15 μg/week/year). Revenues for inpatient surgical treatment according to the German DRG system were 3755.38€/case. Additionally, costs for postoperative ambulatory therapies were 545.05€ for the first year and 384.97€ for the following. CONCLUSION: Due to linearly increases, expenses of medical treatment with cinacalcet for more than 9 months or paricalcitol for more than 12 months exceeded the costs of surgical therapy. The indication of these new medical therapies should be restricted to patients as an interim solution ahead of surgery or in patients considered unfit for surgery.
BACKGROUND: Treatment options for secondary hyperparathyroidism were significantly amended with the introduction of cinacalcet and paricalcitol. Limitations of resources in public health systems demand detailed analyses of accruing costs. The aim of this study was to compare the costs of these new treatment modalities to surgery. METHODS:Patients who underwent initial parathyroidectomy (n = 91) and patients treated with cinacalcet or paricalcitol (n = 100) at an ambulatory dialysis center between 01/2003 and 12/2006 were analyzed. The revenues of both therapies for the funding agencies were calculated by a cost-cost analysis. The real arising costs of the supplier were analyzed and compared to the revenues. RESULTS: Treatment costs for cinacalcet (60 mg/day/year) were 5828.40€ and 4485.20€ for paricalcitol (15 μg/week/year). Revenues for inpatient surgical treatment according to the German DRG system were 3755.38€/case. Additionally, costs for postoperative ambulatory therapies were 545.05€ for the first year and 384.97€ for the following. CONCLUSION: Due to linearly increases, expenses of medical treatment with cinacalcet for more than 9 months or paricalcitol for more than 12 months exceeded the costs of surgical therapy. The indication of these new medical therapies should be restricted to patients as an interim solution ahead of surgery or in patients considered unfit for surgery.