Literature DB >> 21134035

Remote assessment of diabetic foot ulcers using a novel wound imaging system.

Frank L Bowling1, Laurie King, James A Paterson, Jingyi Hu, Benjamin A Lipsky, David R Matthews, Andrew J M Boulton.   

Abstract

Telemedicine allows experts to assess patients in remote locations, enabling quality convenient, cost-effective care. To help assess foot wounds remotely, we investigated the reliability of a novel optical imaging system employing a three-dimensional camera and disposable optical marker. We first examined inter- and intraoperator measurement variability (correlation coefficient) of five clinicians examining three different wounds. Then, to assess of the system's ability to identify key clinically relevant features, we had two clinicians evaluate 20 different wounds at two centers, recording observations on a standardized form. Three other clinicians recorded their observations using only the corresponding three-dimensional images. Using the in-person assessment as the criterion standard, we assessed concordance of the remote with in-person assessments. Measurement variation of area was 3.3% for intraoperator and 11.9% for interoperator; difference in clinician opinion about wound boundary location was significant. Overall agreement for remote vs. in-person assessments was good, but was lowest on the subjective clinical assessments, e.g., value of debridement to improve healing. Limitations of imaging included inability to show certain characteristics, e.g., moistness or exudation. Clinicians gave positive feedback on visual fidelity. This pilot study showed that a clinician viewing only the three-dimensional images could accurately measure and assess a diabetic foot wound remotely.
© 2010 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21134035     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00645.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  15 in total

Review 1.  Methods to assess area and volume of wounds - a systematic review.

Authors:  Line Bisgaard Jørgensen; Jens A Sørensen; Gregor Be Jemec; Knud B Yderstraede
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Applying 21st century imaging technology to wound healing: an Avant-Gardist approach.

Authors:  Frank Lee Bowling; James Paterson; Agbor Ndip
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

Review 3.  Critical Review of Noninvasive Optical Technologies for Wound Imaging.

Authors:  Maanasa Jayachandran; Suset Rodriguez; Elizabeth Solis; Jiali Lei; Anuradha Godavarty
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Wound assessment, imaging and monitoring systems in diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kai Siang Chan; Zhiwen Joseph Lo
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Remote Rating of Atopic Dermatitis Severity Using Photo-Based Assessments: Proof-of-Concept and Reliability Evaluation.

Authors:  Zarqa Ali; Kristina Melbardis Joergensen; Anders Daniel Andersen; Andrei Chiriac; Theis Bjerre-Christensen; Ionela Manole; Ana-Maria Dutei; Irina Deaconescu; Alina Suru; Adina Serban; Ari Pall Isberg; Priyanka Dahiya; Simon Francis Thomsen; John Robert Zibert
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-05-25

Review 6.  Pathways in the diagnosis and management of diabetic polyneuropathy.

Authors:  Michelle Kaku; Aaron Vinik; David M Simpson
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Wound healing effect of Vimlāpanakarma with Jātyādi tailam in diabetic foot.

Authors:  Yogesh Sheshagirirao Kulkarni; Shashidhar V Emmi; Tajahmed N Dongargaon; Amruta A Wali
Journal:  Anc Sci Life       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

8.  The Queensland high risk foot form (QHRFF) - is it a reliable and valid clinical research tool for foot disease?

Authors:  Peter A Lazzarini; Vanessa Ng; Ewan M Kinnear; Maarten C Kamp; Suzanne S Kuys; Cameron Hurst; Lloyd F Reed
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Effect of topically applied Saccharomyces boulardii on the healing of acute porcine wounds: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Jessica Partlow; Anthony Blikslager; Charles Matthews; Mac Law; Joshua Daniels; Rose Baker; Raphael Labens
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-04-11

Review 10.  A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements.

Authors:  Kwang Chear Lee; Janine Dretzke; Liam Grover; Ann Logan; Naiem Moiemen
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2016-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.