BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Molecular variations of the RHD gene may result in the reduced expression of the D antigen and altered Rh phenotypes. In many occasions, they cannot be typed reliably by standard serological methods. Sequence-based typing is the gold standard to determine rare and unknown RHD genotypes. For this pilot study, sequence-based typing by standard Sanger sequencing was compared to a newly established next-generation sequencing approach based on pyrosequencing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six DNA samples were selected after primary serological testing exhibiting a weak reaction in Rh phenotype. Parallel sequence analysis of the complete coding sequence including adjacent intronic sequences allowed a comparison of the methodical potency in mutation detection of Sanger with next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: Sanger sequencing revealed 39 RHD polymorphisms in 21 of 26 samples in the RHD coding region, while pyrosequencing detected all but two alterations resulting in a concordance rate of 94·9% and clearly revealed a heterozygous compound mutation in one sample with RHDψ and Weak D type 4 alleles. The resolution of cis/trans linkage of polymorphisms and exact characterization of a 37 bp duplication was achieved by next-generation sequencing. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that next-generation sequencing offers a new development for high-throughput and clonal sequencing for molecular RHD genotyping. However, further attempts in the methodical set-up have to be undertaken prior to validation and introduction as a routine service.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Molecular variations of the RHD gene may result in the reduced expression of the D antigen and altered Rh phenotypes. In many occasions, they cannot be typed reliably by standard serological methods. Sequence-based typing is the gold standard to determine rare and unknown RHD genotypes. For this pilot study, sequence-based typing by standard Sanger sequencing was compared to a newly established next-generation sequencing approach based on pyrosequencing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six DNA samples were selected after primary serological testing exhibiting a weak reaction in Rh phenotype. Parallel sequence analysis of the complete coding sequence including adjacent intronic sequences allowed a comparison of the methodical potency in mutation detection of Sanger with next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: Sanger sequencing revealed 39 RHD polymorphisms in 21 of 26 samples in the RHD coding region, while pyrosequencing detected all but two alterations resulting in a concordance rate of 94·9% and clearly revealed a heterozygous compound mutation in one sample with RHDψ and Weak D type 4 alleles. The resolution of cis/trans linkage of polymorphisms and exact characterization of a 37 bp duplication was achieved by next-generation sequencing. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that next-generation sequencing offers a new development for high-throughput and clonal sequencing for molecular RHD genotyping. However, further attempts in the methodical set-up have to be undertaken prior to validation and introduction as a routine service.
Authors: Christian Gabriel; Stephanie Stabentheiner; Martin Danzer; Johannes Pröll Journal: Transfus Med Hemother Date: 2011-09-25 Impact factor: 3.747
Authors: Willy A Flegel; Lilian Castilho; Wm Andrew L Heaton; Margaret A Keller; Ellen B Klapper; William J Lane; France Pirenne; Nadine Shehata; Gary Stack; Maryse St-Louis; Christopher A Tormey; Franz F Wagner; Dan A Waxman; Gregory A Denomme Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Willy A Flegel; Qing Chen; Lilian Castilho; Margaret A Keller; Ellen B Klapper; William J Lane; France Pirenne; Gary Stack; Maryse St-Louis; Christopher A Tormey; Dan A Waxman; Christof Weinstock; Silvano Wendel; Gregory A Denomme Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Kshitij Srivastava; Pavel P Khil; Emilia Sippert; Evgeniya Volkova; John P Dekker; Maria Rios; Willy A Flegel Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: William J Lane; Connie M Westhoff; Nicholas S Gleadall; Maria Aguad; Robin Smeland-Wagman; Sunitha Vege; Daimon P Simmons; Helen H Mah; Matthew S Lebo; Klaudia Walter; Nicole Soranzo; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; John Danesh; David J Roberts; Nick A Watkins; Willem H Ouwehand; Adam S Butterworth; Richard M Kaufman; Heidi L Rehm; Leslie E Silberstein; Robert C Green Journal: Lancet Haematol Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 18.959
Authors: Ti-Cheng Chang; Kelly M Haupfear; Jing Yu; Evadnie Rampersaud; Vivien A Sheehan; Jonathan M Flanagan; Jane S Hankins; Mitchell J Weiss; Gang Wu; Sunitha Vege; Connie M Westhoff; Stella T Chou; Yan Zheng Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-09-22
Authors: Silja M Tammi; Wajnat A Tounsi; Susanna Sainio; Michele Kiernan; Neil D Avent; Tracey E Madgett; Katri Haimila Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-10-27