Literature DB >> 21133862

Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population.

Peter R Stone1, Eliza H Y Chan, Lesley M E McCowan, Rennae S Taylor, Jennifer M Mitchell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthy, nulliparous women at low risk for preterm birth would not usually undergo transvaginal scanning at the 20-week morphology scan. The study aimed to determine whether transabdominal cervical measurement would be sufficient to exclude a short cervix in this population. AIMS: To investigate the relationship between transabdominal (TA) and transvaginal (TV) ultrasound measurements of the cervix at 20 weeks' gestation.
METHODS: At 20 weeks' gestation, TA and TV cervical length was measured in 203 healthy nulliparous participants in the Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) study. The TA and TV measurements were correlated and examined for variance.
RESULTS: Paired measurements were achieved in 203 cases. The shortest cervical length on TV scanning was 22 mm, the longest was 59 mm, with TA equivalents of 21 mm and 56 mm respectively. The mean TV cervical length was 39.1 (SD 6.2) mm and mean TA 36.6 (SD 5.8) mm. The average difference between the measurements was 2.6 (SD 5.2) mm, the TA length being the shorter of the two. A TA on the 25th percentile (33 mm length) was associated with a 25th percentile TV length of 36 mm. The intraclass correlation coefficient between TV and TA measurements was 0.77, but the actual difference between the two measurements was not constant.
CONCLUSIONS: Transabdominal measurements are consistently less than TV measurements. As the measurements are correlated, TA scanning could be used to assess cervical length in most cases initially. Where the TA length is < 5th percentile (27 mm), this measure could be used as an indication to perform a TV scan as this correlates with a 5th percentile TV measurement of 28 mm.
© 2010 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2010 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21133862     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01225.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  8 in total

1.  Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix.

Authors:  Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Roberto Romero; Hyunyoung Ahn; Youssef Hussein; Lami Yeo; Steven J Korzeniewski; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-03-16

2.  Short cervix detection in pregnant women by transabdominal sonography with post-void technique.

Authors:  Kiattisak Kongwattanakul; Piyamas Saksiriwuttho; Ratana Komwilaisak; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Consistency in the transabdominal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in mid-pregnancy.

Authors:  Michelle K Pedretti; Elizabeth A Nathan; Dorota A Doherty; Jan E Dickinson
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  Is transabdominal ultrasound scanning of cervical measurement in mid-trimester pregnancy a useful alternative to transvaginal ultrasound scan?

Authors:  Kalyansree Chaudhury; Mrinalkanti Ghosh; Atin Halder; Sourav Senapati; Sudeshna Chaudhury
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2013-12-01

5.  Cervical length measurement: Comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approach.

Authors:  Susan Campbell Westerway; Lars Henning Pedersen; Jon Hyett
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

Review 6.  Cervical length for predicting preterm birth and a comparison of ultrasonic measurement techniques.

Authors:  Sandra O'Hara; Marilyn Zelesco; Zhonghua Sun
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

7.  Can Transabdominal Scan Predict a Short Cervix by Transvaginal Scan?

Authors:  Jayaraman Mavila Nambiar; Muralidhar Vaman Pai; Arevidya Reddy; Pratap Kumar
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2017-04-09

8.  Cervical length varies considering different populations and gestational outcomes: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T G Bortoletto; T V Silva; A Borovac-Pinheiro; C M Pereira; A D Silva; M S França; A R Hatanaka; J P Argenton; R Passini; B W Mol; J G Cecatti; R C Pacagnella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.