Literature DB >> 21133777

Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter spp. isolated from conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems from different U.S. regions.

Daniel A Tadesse1, Peter B Bahnson, Julie A Funk, Siddhartha Thakur, William E Morgan Morrow, Thomas Wittum, Fred DeGraves, Paivi Rajala-Schultz, Wondwossen A Gebreyes.   

Abstract

We conducted a study to compare the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter isolated from 34 farm-slaughter pair cohorts of pigs raised in conventional and antimicrobial-free (ABF) production systems. Isolates originated from four different states of two geographic regions (region 1--Ohio and Michigan; region 2--Wisconsin and Iowa). A total of 838 fecal and 1173 carcass samples were examined. Campylobacter isolates were speciated using multiplex polymerase chain reaction targeting ceuE and hipO genes. The minimum inhibitory concentration was determined using agar dilution to a panel of six antimicrobials: chloramphenicol, erythromycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, and tetracycline. Campylobacter spp. was isolated from 472 of 838 pigs (56.3%). Campylobacter prevalence did not vary significantly based on production system (conventional [58.9%] and ABF [53.7%], odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8-2.6, p = 0.24) or geographic region (region 1 [54.1%] and region 2 [58.2%], OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.6-1.9, p = 0.92). At slaughter plant, Campylobacter prevalence varied based on processing stages (19.4% at pre-evisceration, 25.3% at postevisceration, and 3.2% at postchill). Resistance was common to tetracycline (64.5%), erythromycin (47.9%), and nalidixic acid (23.5%). Campylobacter isolates from conventional production systems were more likely to be erythromycin resistant than from ABF (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.2, p = 0.01). The proportion of ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter coli isolates were 3.7% and 1.2% from ABF and conventional production systems, respectively. Thirty-seven out of 1257 C. coli (2.9%) were resistant to both erythromycin and ciprofloxacin, drugs of choice for treatment of invasive human campylobacteriosis. The finding of ciprofloxacin resistance, particularly from ABF herds, has significant implications on the potential role of risk factors other than mere antimicrobial use for production purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21133777     DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis        ISSN: 1535-3141            Impact factor:   3.171


  11 in total

1.  Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant campylobacter strains in distinct Swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment.

Authors:  Macarena P Quintana-Hayashi; Siddhartha Thakur
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Contamination of Retail Meat Samples with Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Relation to Organic and Conventional Production and Processing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Data from the United States National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, 2012-2017.

Authors:  Gabriel K Innes; Keeve E Nachman; Alison G Abraham; Joan A Casey; Andrew N Patton; Lance B Price; Sara Y Tartof; Meghan F Davis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  Scoping review to identify potential non-antimicrobial interventions to mitigate antimicrobial resistance in commensal enteric bacteria in North American cattle production systems.

Authors:  C P Murphy; V R Fajt; H M Scott; M J Foster; P Wickwire; S A McEwen
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.451

4.  Campylobacter coli in Organic and Conventional Pig Production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance.

Authors:  Isabelle Kempf; Annaelle Kerouanton; Stéphanie Bougeard; Bérengère Nagard; Valérie Rose; Gwénaëlle Mourand; Julia Osterberg; Martine Denis; Björn O Bengtsson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  A randomized controlled trial to evaluate performance of pigs raised in antibiotic-free or conventional production systems following challenge with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Scott Dee; Jose Ezequiel Guzman; Dan Hanson; Noel Garbes; Robert Morrison; Deborah Amodie; Lucina Galina Pantoja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Thermophilic Campylobacter Species in Humans and Animals in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Noel Gahamanyi; Leonard E G Mboera; Mecky I Matee; Dieudonné Mutangana; Erick V G Komba
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-14

7.  Evaluation of the occurrence of sporulating and nonsporulating pathogenic bacteria in manure and in digestate of five agricultural biogas plants.

Authors:  Caroline Le Maréchal; Céline Druilhe; Elisabeth Repérant; Evelyne Boscher; Sandra Rouxel; Sophie Le Roux; Typhaine Poëzévara; Christine Ziebal; Catherine Houdayer; Bérengère Nagard; Frédéric Barbut; Anne-Marie Pourcher; Martine Denis
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Phylogenetic analysis reveals common antimicrobial resistant Campylobacter coli population in antimicrobial-free (ABF) and commercial swine systems.

Authors:  Macarena P Quintana-Hayashi; Siddhartha Thakur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prevalence, Population Diversity and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter coli Isolated in Italian Swine at Slaughterhouse.

Authors:  Guido Di Donato; Francesca Marotta; Roberta Nuvoloni; Katiuscia Zilli; Diana Neri; Daria Di Sabatino; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Di Giannatale
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-02-07

10.  Prevalence and risk factors associated with Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella enterica in livestock raised on diversified small-scale farms in California.

Authors:  A F A Pires; L Patterson; E A Kukielka; P Aminabadi; N Navarro-Gonzalez; M T Jay-Russell
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.