Literature DB >> 21133374

Power-law relationships for estimating mass, fuel consumption and costs of energy conversion equipments.

Marloes Caduff1, Mark A J Huijbregts, Hans-Joerg Althaus, A Jan Hendriks.   

Abstract

To perform life-cycle assessment studies, data on the production and use of the products is required. However, often only few data or measurements are available. Estimation of properties can be performed by applying scaling relationships. In many disciplines, they are used to either predict data or to search for underlying patterns, but they have not been considered in the context of product assessments hitherto. The goal of this study was to explore size scaling for commonly used energy conversion equipment, that is, boilers, engines, and generators. The variables mass M, fuel consumption Q, and costs C were related to power P. The established power-law relationships were M = 10(0.73.. 1.89)P(0.64.. 1.23) (R(2) ≥ 0.94), Q = 10(0.06.. 0.68)P(0.82.. 1.02) (R(2) ≥ 0.98) and C = 10(2.46.. 2.86)P(0.83.. 0.85) (R(2) ≥ 0.83). Mass versus power and costs versus power showed that none of the equipment types scaled isometrically, that is, with a slope of 1. Fuel consumption versus power scaled approximately isometrically for steam boilers, the other equipments scaled significantly lower than 1. This nonlinear scaling behavior induces a significant size effect. The power laws we established can be applied to scale the mass, fuel consumption and costs of energy conversion equipments up or down. Our findings suggest that empirical scaling laws can be used to estimate properties, particularly relevant in studies focusing on early product development for which generally only little information is available.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21133374     DOI: 10.1021/es103095k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  3 in total

1.  Wind power electricity: the bigger the turbine, the greener the electricity?

Authors:  Marloes Caduff; Mark A J Huijbregts; Hans-Joerg Althaus; Annette Koehler; Stefanie Hellweg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Sustainable Design Approach for Modeling Bioprocesses from Laboratory toward Commercialization: Optimizing Chitosan Production.

Authors:  Samir Meramo; Ángel Darío González-Delgado; Sumesh Sukumara; William Stive Fajardo; Jeffrey León-Pulido
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.329

3.  Environmental trade-offs of direct air capture technologies in climate change mitigation toward 2100.

Authors:  Yang Qiu; Patrick Lamers; Vassilis Daioglou; Noah McQueen; Harmen-Sytze de Boer; Mathijs Harmsen; Jennifer Wilcox; André Bardow; Sangwon Suh
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 17.694

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.