Literature DB >> 21132594

Particle release from respirators, part I: determination of the effect of particle size, drop height, and load.

Jeffrey S Birkner1, David Fung, William C Hinds, Nola J Kennedy.   

Abstract

In late 2001, some U.S. Postal Service workers and a few members of Congress were exposed to anthrax spores. This led to an increased effort to develop employable methods to protect workers from exposure to anthrax. Some investigations focused on selection and use of respirators to protect workers against airborne anthrax. The present study evaluated the potential for several types of half-mask respirators to release deposited particles. Four brands of the most commonly used filtering facepiece respirators (hereafter termed masks) were loaded with 0.59-μm, 1.0-μm, and 1.9-μm polystyrene latex (PSL) microspheres (nominally 0.6, 1.0, and 2.0 μm) and then dropped onto a rigid surface. The load conditions were 10, 20, or 40 million particles, and drop heights were 0.15, 0.76, and 1.37 m. For the average conditions of 0.76 m, 1.15 μm size and 22 million particles loaded, the average particle release was 0.604 particles per 10,000 (95% CI: .552, .662) particles loaded for all of the filtering facepieces tested. The averaging of conditions is a useful tool to provide generalized information and is also useful when making risk estimates. For most filtering facepiece respirators, particle release tended to increase with drop height and particle size, and there appeared to be a slight inverse relationship with particle load. Two brands of reusable elastomeric half-mask respirators with P100 high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter cartridges were also evaluated. Results of these tests were inconclusive. Part II in this issue addresses the release of particles when simulating removal of a filtering facepiece from a wearer's head.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21132594     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2011.534975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  5 in total

1.  Respiratory Protection against Pandemic and Epidemic Diseases.

Authors:  Ilaria Rubino; Hyo-Jick Choi
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 2.  What We Are Learning from COVID-19 for Respiratory Protection: Contemporary and Emerging Issues.

Authors:  Rui Li; Mengying Zhang; Yulin Wu; Peixin Tang; Gang Sun; Liwen Wang; Sumit Mandal; Lizhi Wang; James Lang; Alberto Passalacqua; Shankar Subramaniam; Guowen Song
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 4.329

3.  Considerations for recommending extended use and limited reuse of filtering facepiece respirators in health care settings.

Authors:  Edward M Fisher; Ronald E Shaffer
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 4.  Respiratory and facial protection: a critical review of recent literature.

Authors:  D Bunyan; L Ritchie; D Jenkins; J E Coia
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 5.  The COVID-19 pandemic, personal protective equipment and respirator: A narrative review.

Authors:  Jennifer F Ha
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.149

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.