Literature DB >> 21132443

Impact of nodal involvement on surgical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter analysis by the Study Group for Hepatic Surgery of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

Kazuhisa Uchiyama1, Masakazu Yamamoto, Hiroki Yamaue, Shun-ichi Ariizumi, Taku Aoki, Norihiro Kokudo, Tomoki Ebata, Masato Nagino, Masayuki Ohtsuka, Masaru Miyazaki, Eiichi Tanaka, Satoshi Kondo, Takahiro Uenishi, Shoji Kubo, Hiroshi Yoshida, Michiaki Unno, Satoru Imura, Mitsuo Shimada, Masaki Ueno, Tadahiro Takada.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) following hepatectomy and to examine the impact of lymph node metastasis on survival. This study was therefore carried out as a Project Study of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
METHODS: Three hundred and forty-one patients who underwent hepatectomy for ICC between 1995 and 2004 at the 9 institutions of the Medical University Hospitals were analyzed retrospectively. Multivariate regression analyses and a Kaplan-Meyer analysis were performed to identify prognostic factors.
RESULTS: Pathological lymph node metastasis was one of the significant factors affecting overall survival (hazard ratio 2.10, p < 0.001) based on the multivariate analysis. Among the patients who underwent extended lymphadenectomy beyond the hepatoduodenal ligament, the median survival of 121 patients with nodal involvement was 12.2 months. Only seven patients with nodal involvement have survived for more than 4 years.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, intrahepatic metastasis, and nodal involvement were the significant independent predictors of poor prognosis by multivariate analysis. Further prospective studies may thus be needed to confirm these findings, because this study has a limitation in that it was a retrospective study with multicenter data collection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21132443     DOI: 10.1007/s00534-010-0349-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  39 in total

Review 1.  Staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of surgical therapy for all potentially resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center cohort study.

Authors:  Xianwu Luo; Lei Yuan; Yi Wang; Ruiliang Ge; Yanfu Sun; Gongtian Wei
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: clinicopathological differences between peripheral type and hilar type.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Takeshi Sudo; Yasushi Hashimoto; Akira Nakashima; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Factors affecting survival after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sae Murakami; Tetsuo Ajiki; Taro Okazaki; Kimihiko Ueno; Masahiro Kido; Ippei Matsumoto; Takumi Fukumoto; Yonson Ku
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Prediction of the postoperative prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC): importance of preoperatively- determined anatomic invasion level and number of tumors.

Authors:  Shigeru Marubashi; Kunihito Gotoh; Hidenori Takahashi; Hiroaki Ohigashi; Masahiko Yano; Osamu Ishikawa; Masato Sakon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Lymphadenectomy in the staging and treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based study using the National Cancer Institute SEER database.

Authors:  Clancy J Clark; Christina M Wood-Wentz; Kaye M Reid-Lombardo; Michael L Kendrick; Marianne Huebner; Florencia G Que
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 7.  Surgical treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Takahiro Uenishi; Takatsugu Yamamoto; Shigekazu Takemura; Shoji Kubo
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-15

Review 8.  The value of systematic lymph node dissection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from the viewpoint of liver lymphatics.

Authors:  Yuji Morine; Mitsuo Shimada
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  Oncologic Impact of Lymph Node Dissection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: a Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Authors:  Sung Hyun Kim; Dai Hoon Han; Gi Hong Choi; Jin Sub Choi; Kyung Sik Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and cholangiolocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis and chronic viral hepatitis.

Authors:  Shun-ichi Ariizumi; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.