OBJECTIVE: With the advent of personal health records and other patient-focused health technologies, there is a growing need to better understand factors that contribute to acceptance and use of such innovations. In this study, we employed the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology as the basis for determining what predicts patients' acceptance (measured by behavioral intention) and perceived effective use of a web-based, interactive self-management innovation among home care patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from a randomized field study evaluating a technology-assisted home care nursing practice with adults with chronic cardiac disease. MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS: A questionnaire was designed based on validated measurement scales from prior research and was completed by 101 participants for measuring the acceptance constructs as part of the parent study protocol. Latent variable modeling with item parceling guided assessment of patients' acceptance. RESULTS: Perceived usefulness accounted for 53.9% of the variability in behavioral intention, the measure of acceptance. Together, perceived usefulness, health care knowledge, and behavioral intention accounted for 68.5% of the variance in perceived effective use. Perceived ease of use and subjective norm indirectly influenced behavioral intention, through perceived usefulness. Perceived ease of use and subjective norm explained 48% of the total variance in perceived usefulness. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, subjective norm, and healthcare knowledge together predict most of the variance in patients' acceptance and self-reported use of the web-based self-management technology.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: With the advent of personal health records and other patient-focused health technologies, there is a growing need to better understand factors that contribute to acceptance and use of such innovations. In this study, we employed the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology as the basis for determining what predicts patients' acceptance (measured by behavioral intention) and perceived effective use of a web-based, interactive self-management innovation among home care patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from a randomized field study evaluating a technology-assisted home care nursing practice with adults with chronic cardiac disease. MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS: A questionnaire was designed based on validated measurement scales from prior research and was completed by 101 participants for measuring the acceptance constructs as part of the parent study protocol. Latent variable modeling with item parceling guided assessment of patients' acceptance. RESULTS: Perceived usefulness accounted for 53.9% of the variability in behavioral intention, the measure of acceptance. Together, perceived usefulness, health care knowledge, and behavioral intention accounted for 68.5% of the variance in perceived effective use. Perceived ease of use and subjective norm indirectly influenced behavioral intention, through perceived usefulness. Perceived ease of use and subjective norm explained 48% of the total variance in perceived usefulness. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, subjective norm, and healthcare knowledge together predict most of the variance in patients' acceptance and self-reported use of the web-based self-management technology.
Authors: Stephen M Haley; Alan M Jette; Wendy J Coster; Jill T Kooyoomjian; Suzette Levenson; Tim Heeren; Jacqueline Ashba Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Michael Littner; Maxwell Hirshkowitz; David Davila; W McDowell Anderson; Clete A Kushida; B Tucker Woodson; Stephen F Johnson; S Wise Merrill Journal: Sleep Date: 2002-03-15 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Joseph A Diaz; Rebecca A Griffith; James J Ng; Steven E Reinert; Peter D Friedmann; Anne W Moulton Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Miha Cimperman; Maja Makovec Brenčič; Peter Trkman; Mateja de Leonni Stanonik Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2013-08-09 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Laura Block; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Anna Jolliff; Shannon Mullen; Nicole E Werner Journal: Geriatr Nurs Date: 2020-07-12 Impact factor: 2.361
Authors: Sara J Czaja; Joseph Sharit; Chin Chin Lee; Sankaran N Nair; Mario A Hernández; Neysarí Arana; Shih Hua Fu Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Elizabeth Anne Bennett; Rachel Pearl Kolko; Lichun Chia; Jennifer Padden Elliott; Melissa Ann Kalarchian Journal: West J Nurs Res Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Yun Jiang; Susan M Sereika; Annette DeVito Dabbs; Steven M Handler; Elizabeth A Schlenk Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 2.342