Literature DB >> 21131387

Effects of ULTRAfiltration vs. DIureticS on clinical, biohumoral and haemodynamic variables in patients with deCOmpensated heart failure: the ULTRADISCO study.

Cristina Giglioli1, Daniele Landi, Emanuele Cecchi, Marco Chiostri, Gian Franco Gensini, Serafina Valente, Mauro Ciaccheri, Gabriele Castelli, Salvatore Mario Romano.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the clinical, biohumoral, and haemodynamic effects of ultrafiltration vs. intravenous diuretics in patients with decompensated heart failure (HF). Signs and symptoms of volume overload are often present in these patients and standard therapy consists primarily of intravenous diuretics. Increasing evidence suggests that ultrafiltration can be an effective alternative treatment. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Thirty patients with decompensated HF were randomly assigned to diuretics or ultrafiltration. Haemodynamic variables, including several novel parameters indicating the overall performance of the cardiovascular system, were continuously assessed with the Pressure Recording Analytical Method before, during, at the end of treatment (EoT) and 36 h after completing treatment. Aldosterone and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) plasma levels were also measured. Patients treated with ultrafiltration had a more pronounced reduction in signs and symptoms of HF at EoT compared with baseline, and a significant decrease in plasma aldosterone (0.24 ± 0.25 vs. 0.86 ± 1.04 nmol/L; P < 0.001) and NT-proBNP levels (2823 ± 2474 vs. 5063 ± 3811 ng/L; P < 0.001) compared with the diuretic group. The ultrafiltration group showed a significant improvement (% of baseline) in a number of haemodynamic parameters, including stroke volume index (114.0 ± 11.7%; P < 0.001), cardiac index (123.0 ± 20.8%; P < 0.001), cardiac power output (114.0 ± 13.8%; P < 0.001), dP/dt(max) (129.5 ± 19.9%; P < 0.001), and cardiac cycle efficiency (0.24 ± 0.54 vs. -0.14 ± 0.50 units; P < 0.05), and a significant reduction in systemic vascular resistance 36 h after the treatment (88.0 ± 10.9%; P < 0.001), which was not observed in the diuretic group.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced HF, ultrafiltration facilitates a greater clinical improvement compared with diuretic infusion by ameliorating haemodynamics (assessed using a minimally invasive methodology) without a marked increase in aldosterone or NT-proBNP levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21131387     DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail        ISSN: 1388-9842            Impact factor:   15.534


  27 in total

Review 1.  Management of Cardiogenic Shock in a Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Ju H Kim; Anusha Sunkara; Sara Varnado
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar

Review 2.  Readmission rate after ultrafiltration in acute decompensated heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Waqas Javed Siddiqui; Andrew R Kohut; Syed F Hasni; Jesse M Goldman; Benjamin Silverman; Ellie Kelepouris; Howard J Eisen; Sandeep Aggarwal
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 3.  [Cardio-renal axis : Relationship of heart failure and renal insufficiency as comorbidities].

Authors:  M Zeisberg; M J Koziolek
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Impact of Ultrafiltration on Serum Sodium Homeostasis and its Clinical Implication in Patients With Acute Heart Failure, Congestion, and Worsening Renal Function.

Authors:  Takeshi Kitai; Justin L Grodin; Yong-Hyun Kim; W H Wilson Tang
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 5.  Defining the role of ultrafiltration therapy in acute heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ankur Jain; Nikhil Agrawal; Amir Kazory
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  Decongestion strategies and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation in acute heart failure.

Authors:  Robert J Mentz; Susanna R Stevens; Adam D DeVore; Anuradha Lala; Justin M Vader; Omar F AbouEzzeddine; Prateeti Khazanie; Margaret M Redfield; Lynne W Stevenson; Christopher M O'Connor; Steven R Goldsmith; Bradley A Bart; Kevin J Anstrom; Adrian F Hernandez; Eugene Braunwald; G Michael Felker
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 12.035

Review 7.  Cardiorenal syndrome: pathophysiology and treatment.

Authors:  Dmitry Shchekochikhin; Robert W Schrier; JoAnn Lindenfeld
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Treating volume overload in acutely decompensated heart failure: established and novel therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Katerina Koniari; John Parissis; Ioannis Paraskevaidis; Maria Anastasiou-Nana
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2012-09

Review 9.  Cardiorenal syndrome: ultrafiltration therapy for heart failure--trials and tribulations.

Authors:  Amir Kazory
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 10.  The acute cardiorenal syndrome type I: considerations on physiology, epidemiology, and therapy.

Authors:  Ali A Valika; Maria Rosa Costanzo
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.