Literature DB >> 21131307

A randomised controlled trial to assess pain with urethral swabs.

Ade Apoola1, Maite Herrero-Diaz, Elley FitzHugh, Raj Rajakumar, Apostolos Fakis, Jayne Oakden.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urethral swabs are uncomfortable due to the nature of the mucosa and may be a reason for non-attendance of men at sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics. This randomised controlled trial describes the extent of discomfort associated with direct urethral sampling, and determines whether this varies by the type of swab used.
METHODS: Male patients over the age of 16 years having swab tests were invited to participate and were randomly assigned to receive either a gonorrhoea dacron-tipped swab, a chlamydia rayon-tipped swab or a plastic 10 μl urethral loop first for urethral sampling followed by the others sequentially. Discomfort was measured using a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS).
FINDINGS: 129 men having urethral swabs carried out as part of their screening tests for STI were invited to participate in the study and 121 were recruited. The median pain scores (IQR) regardless of sampling method, before and after the urethral sampling were, first 0 mm (0-0) and 50 mm (22-71) (p<0.001), second 9 mm (0-28) and 59.5 mm (38.3-78) (p<0.001) and third 10 mm (0-31) and 58 mm (29.3-80) (p<0.001). Direct urethral sampling was associated with a median pain score of 60.5 mm using a rayon swab, 52 mm using a dacron swab and 25.5 mm using a plastic loop.
INTERPRETATION: Direct urethral sampling is associated with discomfort and/or pain in men, which was significantly greater with a swab than a plastic loop. Urine should therefore be the specimen type of choice. When direct urethral sampling is indicated a loop is preferable to a urethral swab.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21131307     DOI: 10.1136/sti.2010.042861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  6 in total

1.  Uses of pathogen detection data to estimate vaccine direct effects in case-control studies.

Authors:  Joseph A Lewnard
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Meatal Swabs Contain Less Cellular Material and Are Associated with a Decrease in Gram Stain Smear Quality Compared to Urethral Swabs in Men.

Authors:  Stephen J Jordan; Jane R Schwebke; Kristal J Aaron; Barbara Van Der Pol; Edward W Hook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Performance evaluation of automated urine microscopy as a rapid, non-invasive approach for the diagnosis of non-gonococcal urethritis.

Authors:  Marcus J Pond; Achyuta V Nori; Sheel Patel; Ken Laing; Margarita Ajayi; Andrew J Copas; Philip D Butcher; Phillip Hay; Syed Tariq Sadiq
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Optimizing bacterial DNA extraction in urine.

Authors:  Matthew M Munch; Laura C Chambers; Lisa E Manhart; Dan Domogala; Anthony Lopez; David N Fredricks; Sujatha Srinivasan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Management of non-gonococcal urethritis.

Authors:  Harald Moi; Karla Blee; Patrick J Horner
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.090

6.  Peyronie's disease after urethral swab, an unusual complication: a case report.

Authors:  Gianni Paulis; Davide Barletta
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2015-11-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.