Cara Bailey1, Roger Murphy, Davina Porock. 1. School of Nursing, Queens Medical Centre, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. c.bailey.2@bham.ac.uk
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The emergency department (ED) is the gateway to the hospital setting. Despite the intentions from the end-of-life care strategy in the UK to improve care provision, the ED has increasingly become the access site for end-of-life support. Little attention has been given to this aspect of the work of the ED, even as the quality of end-of-life care in hospitals has become the subject of increasing concerns. We explore end-of-life care in the ED and provide an understanding of how care is delivered to the dying, deceased and bereaved in the emergency setting. METHODS: Observation was carried out in a large urban ED during 12 months. This was complemented by detailed interviews with emergency staff, patients diagnosed with a terminal condition, who had visited the ED in the previous 6 months, and their relatives. Data were analyzed thematically, following the normal conventions of ethnographic research. RESULTS: Two distinct trajectories of end-of-life care were identified in the ED; the spectacular and the subtacular. Patients and family members experiencing end-of-life care in the ED have distinctly different care because of the nature of these 2 trajectories, frequently resulting in dissatisfaction for staff and distress and frustration for patients and their relatives. CONCLUSION: The ED is priority driven, focused on resuscitation and the prolongation of life. As a result of the consuming nature of the spectacular death, a reluctance to build relationships with the dying, and a lack of educational support, the care needs of patients in the subtacular trajectory are somewhat neglected. These trajectories can be used to identify the shortfalls in end-of-life care in the ED and raise serious concerns for policy in regard to staffing, resources, and professional development.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: The emergency department (ED) is the gateway to the hospital setting. Despite the intentions from the end-of-life care strategy in the UK to improve care provision, the ED has increasingly become the access site for end-of-life support. Little attention has been given to this aspect of the work of the ED, even as the quality of end-of-life care in hospitals has become the subject of increasing concerns. We explore end-of-life care in the ED and provide an understanding of how care is delivered to the dying, deceased and bereaved in the emergency setting. METHODS: Observation was carried out in a large urban ED during 12 months. This was complemented by detailed interviews with emergency staff, patients diagnosed with a terminal condition, who had visited the ED in the previous 6 months, and their relatives. Data were analyzed thematically, following the normal conventions of ethnographic research. RESULTS: Two distinct trajectories of end-of-life care were identified in the ED; the spectacular and the subtacular. Patients and family members experiencing end-of-life care in the ED have distinctly different care because of the nature of these 2 trajectories, frequently resulting in dissatisfaction for staff and distress and frustration for patients and their relatives. CONCLUSION: The ED is priority driven, focused on resuscitation and the prolongation of life. As a result of the consuming nature of the spectacular death, a reluctance to build relationships with the dying, and a lack of educational support, the care needs of patients in the subtacular trajectory are somewhat neglected. These trajectories can be used to identify the shortfalls in end-of-life care in the ED and raise serious concerns for policy in regard to staffing, resources, and professional development.
Authors: Corita R Grudzen; Lynne D Richardson; Susan S Hopper; Joanna M Ortiz; Christine Whang; R Sean Morrison Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2011-07-30 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Tracey J Weiland; Heather Lane; George A Jelinek; Claudia H Marck; Jennifer Weil; Mark Boughey; Jennifer Philip Journal: Int J Emerg Med Date: 2015-04-29
Authors: Jan Shoenberger; Sangeeta Lamba; Rebecca Goett; Paul DeSandre; Kate Aberger; Suzanne Bigelow; Todd Brandtman; Garrett K Chan; Robert Zalenski; David Wang; Mark Rosenberg; Karen Jubanyik Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2018-03-22