Literature DB >> 21131092

Priority setting for systematic review of health care interventions in Nigeria.

Martin Meremikwu1, Ekong Udoh, Bridget Nwagbara, Emmanuel Effa, Chioma Oringanje, Bassey Edet, Eucharia Nwagbara, Segun Bello, Felix Eke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In an era of evidence based medicine and systematic review, this study seeks to identify priority systematic review topics that address common health problems in Nigeria.
METHODS: Firstly, a primary list of health problems was compiled from the National Health Management Information Systems and information from key informants (health professionals, researchers and NGOs) drawn from the six geo-political zones in Nigeria. Key steps included compilation and ranking of a comprehensive list of health problems into 4 categories: adult communicable, non-communicable, maternal and child health; searching the Cochrane Library and electronic databases for systematic reviews on identified priority problems, analysis of search outputs to identify gaps; listing and ranking of new priority systematic review topics using pre-determined criteria.
RESULTS: Eighteen questions made the final list of priorities systematic reviews and 9 of them were related to malaria. There were 7 additional issues that the panelists identified as crucial cross-cutting issues that need to be addressed in systematic reviews.
CONCLUSION: Identification and prioritization of systematic reviews relevant to health care in Nigeria will improve the opportunity to deliver evidence-based and equitable health care to the people. These topics are likely to be also important for health care decision in other resource-poor settings.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21131092     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  5 in total

Review 1.  How are health research priorities set in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published reports.

Authors:  Skye McGregor; Klara J Henderson; John M Kaldor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Identifying and prioritising systematic review topics with public health stakeholders: A protocol for a modified Delphi study in Switzerland to inform future research agendas.

Authors:  Dyon Hoekstra; Margot Mütsch; Christina Kien; Ansgar Gerhardus; Stefan K Lhachimi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Study-based registers reduce waste in systematic reviewing: discussion and case report.

Authors:  Farhad Shokraneh; Clive E Adams
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-30

4.  Priority setting for new systematic reviews: processes and lessons learned in three regions in Africa.

Authors:  Emmanuel E Effa; Olabisi Oduwole; Anel Schoonees; Ameer Hohlfeld; Solange Durao; Tamara Kredo; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Martin Meremikwu; Pierre Ongolo-Zogo; Charles Wiysonge; Taryn Young
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-07-26

5.  Key stakeholders' perspectives and experiences with defining, identifying and displaying gaps in health research: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Linda Nyanchoka; Catrin Tudur-Smith; Raphaël Porcher; Darko Hren
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.