Literature DB >> 21130963

Hybrid revascularization, comprising coronary artery bypass graft with exclusive arterial conduits followed by early drug-eluting stent implantation, in multivessel coronary artery disease.

Cédric Delhaye1, Arnaud Sudre, Gilles Lemesle, Laure Vanesson, Mohamad Koussa, Georges Fayad, Christophe Bauters, Jean-Marc Lablanche, Thomas Modine.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the feasibility and safety of a hybrid myocardial revascularization strategy combining "exclusive arterial" conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) followed by early drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).
METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients with multivessel CAD were enrolled prospectively. Within 48 hours of CABG using left internal mammary artery (IMA) to left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery with or without right IMA to non-LAD vessel in an open chest approach, DESs were implanted systematically in an additional vessel after a clopidogrel 300-mg preloading dose. This group was compared with 18 matched patients who underwent standard CABG alone using left IMA to LAD and at least one additional graft.
RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. There were 46 grafts in the CABG group and 28 in the hybrid group. In the hybrid group, 27.8% of patients were treated off-pump versus none in the CABG group; a median of 2 (interquartile range: 1-2) stents was implanted per patient. The hybrid procedure was associated with shorter durations of cardiopulmonary bypass (77 [67-100] min versus 97 [90-105] min, P=0.049). Major bleeding rates were higher in the CABG group, but the difference was not statistically significant (44.4% versus 11.1%, P=0.06). Re-intervention for bleeding was not needed in either group. One (5.6%) myocardial infarction occurred in hospital in each group following CABG. At 1 year, the cumulative rates of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization) were similar (11.2% in hybrid group versus 5.6% in CABG group, P=0.99). One death occurred in the CABG group and one target vessel revascularization in the hybrid group.
CONCLUSION: A hybrid revascularization strategy, combining conventional CABG with exclusive arterial conduits followed by early DES implantation, is feasible. One-year event rates compare favourably to those with traditional CABG alone.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21130963     DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2010.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 1875-2128            Impact factor:   2.340


  8 in total

Review 1.  Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Surgery and Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Can We Routinely Achieve Less Invasive Coronary Surgery?

Authors:  Maria Rodriguez; Marc Ruel
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 2.  Status quo of hybrid coronary revascularization for multi-vessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ralf E Harskamp; Zhe Zheng; John H Alexander; Judson B Williams; Ying Xian; Michael E Halkos; J Matthew Brennan; Robbert J de Winter; Peter K Smith; Renato D Lopes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Yu; Keying Zhu; Nannan Du; Yuexiu Si; Jiali Liang; Ruijing Shen; Bangsheng Chen
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 4.  Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Zhu; Pengyu Zhou; Yong Sun; Yilong Guo; Mingjie Mai; Shaoyi Zheng
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Mid-term follow-up outcomes of 2-staged hybrid coronary revascularization compared with off-pump coronary artery bypass for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Song Wu; Yunpeng Ling; Yuanhao Fu; Lufeng Zhang; Hang Yang; Lijun Guo; Wei Gao; Feng Wan
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 6.  Short-Term and Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Li Dong; Yi-Kun Kang; Xiang-Guang An
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 7.  Hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander C Reynolds; Nicola King
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Hybrid coronary revascularization as a safe, feasible, and viable alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: what is the current evidence?

Authors:  Arjan J F P Verhaegh; Ryan E Accord; Leen van Garsse; Jos G Maessen
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2013-04-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.