Literature DB >> 21130597

Change of aesthetic and functional outcome over time and their relationship to quality of life after breast conserving therapy.

J Heil1, E Czink, M Golatta, S Schott, H Hof, E Jenetzky, M Blumenstein, A Maleika, G Rauch, C Sohn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We analyzed changes in aesthetic and functional outcome over time after breast conserving therapy. Our special interest resides in the question of whether these aspects gain or loose their influence on quality of life (QoL) with temporal progress. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective single centre cohort study included 138 patients, treated with breast conserving surgery and consecutive radiotherapy. Patients completed two questionnaires one week and one year after surgery: the BCTOS (Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale) to measure Functional, Aesthetic, and Breast Sensitivity Status and the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) C30-BR23 to assess QoL. We applied correlation and multiple regression analysis as statistical methods.
RESULTS: Aesthetic and Functional Status did not change significantly over one year, whereas Breast Sensitivity Status and several QoL subscales showed significant improvement (p < 0.0001). Correlations between BCTOS scales and EORTC subscales remain similar over time. Functional and Aesthetic Status kept a strong impact on global health (Spearman's Rho = -0.28 to -0.45 depending on time of assessment). Increasing age and poorer Functional Status shortly after surgery are predictors of a decline in global health over one year (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Functional and aesthetic outcome after breast conserving surgery maintain their impact on QoL over a one year follow-up period and are valuable predictors of QoL.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21130597     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  12 in total

Review 1.  Tumour-adapted Reduction Mammoplasty - a New (Old) Breast Conserving Strategy: Review.

Authors:  M Eichbaum; A Dietrich; J Reinhard; R Steinwasser; C Eichbaum
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  PROMs following breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer: results from a prospective longitudinal monocentric study.

Authors:  I Kindts; A Laenen; M van den Akker; C Weltens
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Therapeutic effect of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery versus triple-port laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cyst.

Authors:  Yihai Zhang; Li Shi; Chunfu Li; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 4.  A review of studies on omitting surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kexin Feng; Ziqi Jia; Gang Liu; Zeyu Xing; Jiayi Li; Jiaxin Li; Fei Ren; Jiang Wu; Wenyan Wang; Jie Wang; Jiaqi Liu; Xiang Wang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 5.942

5.  Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: Aesthetic Satisfaction and Oncological Outcomes.

Authors:  Sevgi Kurt Yazar; Dinçer Altınel; Merdan Serin; Şefika Aksoy; Memet Yazar
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-01-01

6.  Patient reported cosmetic outcome after vacuum assisted excision of benign breast lesions: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Elles M F van de Voort; Taco M A L Klem; Gerson M Struik; Erwin Birnie; Renata H J A Sinke; Ali Ghandi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Aesthetic result after breast-conserving therapy is associated with quality of life several years after treatment. Swedish women evaluated with BCCT.core and BREAST-Q™.

Authors:  Cecilia Dahlbäck; Jenny Heiman Ullmark; Martin Rehn; Anita Ringberg; Jonas Manjer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Breast cancer patient-reported outcome of factors influencing cosmetic satisfaction after breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  A T P M Brands-Appeldoorn; A J G Maaskant-Braat; L Janssen; L A D M van Osch; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; R M H Roumen
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.239

9.  Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis Comparing Conventional with Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: Oncological and Surgical Outcomes in Women with High-Risk Breast Cancer from the OPBC-01/iTOP2 Study.

Authors:  Florian Fitzal; Michael Bolliger; Daniela Dunkler; Angelika Geroldinger; Luca Gambone; Jörg Heil; Fabian Riedel; Jana de Boniface; Camilla Andre; Zoltan Matrai; Dávid Pukancsik; Regis R Paulinelli; Valerijus Ostapenko; Arvydas Burneckis; Andrej Ostapenko; Edvin Ostapenko; Francesco Meani; Yves Harder; Marta Bonollo; Andrea S M Alberti; Christoph Tausch; Bärbel Papassotiropoulos; Ruth Helfgott; Dietmar Heck; Hans-Jörg Fehrer; Markus Acko; Peter Schrenk; Elisabeth K Trapp; Pristauz-Telsnigg Gunda; Paliczek Clara; Giacomo Montagna; Mathilde Ritter; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Sander Steffen; Laszlo Romics; Elizabeth Morrow; Katharina Lorenz; Mathias Fehr; Walter Paul Weber
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Long-Term Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life After Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Prospective Study Using the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Ilona Stolpner; Jörg Heil; Fabian Riedel; Markus Wallwiener; Benedikt Schäfgen; Manuel Feißt; Michael Golatta; André Hennigs
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.