Literature DB >> 21130547

Reflexivity in midwifery research: the insider/outsider debate.

Elaine Burns1, Jennifer Fenwick, Virginia Schmied, Athena Sheehan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the challenges of conducting an observational study of postnatal interactions, between midwives and women, when the researcher was a midwife observing in familiar midwifery settings.
BACKGROUND: Participant observation conducted by researchers who are themselves midwives raises questions regarding the influence of 'identity' and 'insider' knowledge on the conduct of such projects. The insider/outsider status of researchers has been explored in other disciplines, yet this is an area which is underdeveloped in the midwifery literature where few attempts have been made to subject this issue to sustained analysis.
DESIGN: A qualitative study (investigating the provision of breast-feeding support in the first week after birth) provided the opportunity for reflexive exploration of the tensions faced by midwife researchers.
SETTING: Two maternity units in New South Wales, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 40 midwives and 78 breast-feeding women.
FINDINGS: Possessing 'insider' midwifery knowledge was advantageous in the 'getting in' and 'fitting in' phases of this research study however unanticipated role ambiguity, and moral and ethical challenges, arose as a result of this 'insider' knowledge and status. Prolonged periods of observation challenged the midwife researcher's preconceived ideas and early decisions about the advantages and disadvantages of being an 'insider' or an 'outsider' in the research setting. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: Reflexive analysis of insider/outsider experiences revealed the middle ground which participant observers tend to navigate. Whilst professional insider knowledge and status offered many advantages, especially at the first study setting, some of the inherent embodied, and socially constructed features of the 'midwife' observer role, were unanticipated. Cultural competence, in these observational study settings, translated into role ambiguity, and at times, culturally entrenched role expectations. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Midwifery observation of clinical practice, for research, or practice development purposes, requires a degree of juggling of insider knowledge to facilitate observation and analysis. Prior to conducting observations midwives should consider how best to occupy the middle ground between insider and outsider. Within the middle ground the midwife can draw on those aspects of 'self' required to negotiate respectful relationships with colleagues, whilst also ensuring the maintenance of an analytical degree of distancing.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21130547     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  15 in total

1.  Mining for liquid gold: midwifery language and practices associated with early breastfeeding support.

Authors:  Elaine Burns; Jenny Fenwick; Athena Sheehan; Virginia Schmied
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  'This little piranha': a qualitative analysis of the language used by health professionals and mothers to describe infant behaviour during breastfeeding.

Authors:  Elaine Burns; Jenny Fenwick; Athena Sheehan; Virginia Schmied
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Unlocking intuition and expertise: using interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore clinical decision making.

Authors:  Natalie Elizabeth Anderson; Julia Slark; Merryn Gott
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2019-03-05

4.  Hmong Older Adults' Perceptions of Insider and Outsider Researchers: Does It Matter for Research Participation?

Authors:  Maichou Lor; Barbara J Bowers
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Peer interviewing in medical education research: experiences and perceptions of student interviewers and interviewees.

Authors:  Elaine Byrne; Ruairi Brugha; Eric Clarke; Aisling Lavelle; Alice McGarvey
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  Researcher-researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability.

Authors:  Målfrid Råheim; Liv Heide Magnussen; Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse; Åshild Lunde; Torild Jacobsen; Astrid Blystad
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2016-06-14

7.  Towards the development of a wellbeing model for aboriginal and Torres Strait islander peoples living with chronic disease.

Authors:  Carol Davy; Elaine Kite; Leda Sivak; Alex Brown; Timena Ahmat; Gary Brahim; Anna Dowling; Shaun Jacobson; Tania Kelly; Kaylene Kemp; Fiona Mitchell; Tina Newman; Margaret O'Brien; Jason Pitt; Kesha Roesch; Christine Saddler; Maida Stewart; Tiana Thomas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Women's reasons for, and experiences of, choosing a homebirth following a caesarean section.

Authors:  Hazel Keedle; Virginia Schmied; Elaine Burns; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Autoethnography and severe perineal trauma--an unexpected journey from disembodiment to embodiment.

Authors:  Holly S Priddis
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 10.  Once a clinician, always a clinician: a systematic review to develop a typology of clinician-researcher dual-role experiences in health research with patient-participants.

Authors:  E Jean C Hay-Smith; Melanie Brown; Lynley Anderson; Gareth J Treharne
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.