Longjian Liu1. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA. jian.Liu@drexel.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the independent and joint effects of having a lack of social connections (LSC) and diabetes mellitus (DM) on the risk of mortality among older white and African-American (AA) adults. METHODS: Data (N = 9246) from the Second Longitudinal Study of Aging was used. LSC score was created by the use of seven social connection measures. Subjects with a score ≥90% of the distribution in the total sample were classified having LSC. RESULTS: Subjects with LSC, DM, or both had significantly greater risks of death. After multiple covariates were adjusted, the hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of death in those with both LSC and DM were 2.45 (2.43-2.47) in white men, and 2.95 (2.91-2.99) in AA men. The corresponding values were 2.72 (2.70-2.73) in white women and 3.13 (3.09-3.18) in AA women. Those who had LSC but had no DM, had a similar survival trend to those who had DM only. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of LSC for mortality is similar to DM. Both factors are independent predictors of death among white and AA adults. In addition to controlling disease risks, improvement of social connections may offer new insights to the reduction of mortality among older adults.
PURPOSE: To examine the independent and joint effects of having a lack of social connections (LSC) and diabetes mellitus (DM) on the risk of mortality among older white and African-American (AA) adults. METHODS: Data (N = 9246) from the Second Longitudinal Study of Aging was used. LSC score was created by the use of seven social connection measures. Subjects with a score ≥90% of the distribution in the total sample were classified having LSC. RESULTS: Subjects with LSC, DM, or both had significantly greater risks of death. After multiple covariates were adjusted, the hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of death in those with both LSC and DM were 2.45 (2.43-2.47) in white men, and 2.95 (2.91-2.99) in AA men. The corresponding values were 2.72 (2.70-2.73) in white women and 3.13 (3.09-3.18) in AA women. Those who had LSC but had no DM, had a similar survival trend to those who had DM only. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of LSC for mortality is similar to DM. Both factors are independent predictors of death among white and AA adults. In addition to controlling disease risks, improvement of social connections may offer new insights to the reduction of mortality among older adults.
Authors: Kassandra I Alcaraz; Katherine S Eddens; Jennifer L Blase; W Ryan Diver; Alpa V Patel; Lauren R Teras; Victoria L Stevens; Eric J Jacobs; Susan M Gapstur Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: S Ryan Greysen; Leora I Horwitz; Kenneth E Covinsky; Kirsha Gordon; Michael E Ohl; Amy C Justice Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-08-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: André Hajek; Christian Brettschneider; Carolin Lange; Tina Posselt; Birgitt Wiese; Susanne Steinmann; Siegfried Weyerer; Jochen Werle; Michael Pentzek; Angela Fuchs; Janine Stein; Tobias Luck; Horst Bickel; Edelgard Mösch; Steffen Wolfsgruber; Kathrin Heser; Wolfgang Maier; Martin Scherer; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Hans-Helmut König Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Becky Marquez; Andrea Anderson; Rena R Wing; Delia S West; Robert L Newton; Maria Meacham; Helen P Hazuda; Anne Peters; Maria G Montez; Stephanie T Broyles; Martha Walker; Gina Evans-Hudsnall Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Aquiles Salas; Daisy Acosta; Cleusa P Ferri; Mariella Guerra; Yueqin Huang; K S Jacob; Ivonne Z Jimenez-Velazquez; Juan J Llibre Rodriguez; Ana L Sosa; Richard Uwakwe; Joseph D Williams; A T Jotheeswaran; Zhaorui Liu; A M Lopez Medina; Rosa Maria Salinas-Contreras; Martin J Prince Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 3.240