Literature DB >> 21129699

["Evidence-based medicine" and "mixed methods": how methodological discussions in the medical and social sciences could benefit from each other].

Udo Kelle1, Tanja Krones.   

Abstract

The debate about adequate research methods for obtaining relevant results in clinical medicine and health care does not take place in a vacuum. In the present paper the longstanding debate about the epistemological underpinnings and methodological perspectives of qualitative and quantitative research methods in the social sciences is outlined and fructified for evidence-based medicine and health care. By using examples from research practice we will demonstrate that both the utilisation of qualitative methods and the use of a "mixed methods" design may contribute to the current methodological debate and improve research practice in evidence-based health care.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21129699     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  1 in total

1.  The Swiss Neonatal Quality Cycle, a monitor for clinical performance and tool for quality improvement.

Authors:  Mark Adams; Tjade Claus Hoehre; Hans Ulrich Bucher
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 2.125

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.