Literature DB >> 21129540

Perinatal management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: when and how should babies be delivered? Results from the Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network.

Arash Safavi1, Yi Lin, Erik D Skarsgard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A prenatal diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) enables therapeutic decision making during the intrapartum period. This study seeks to identify the gestational age and delivery mode associated with optimal outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A national data set was used to study CDH babies born between 2005 and 2009. The primary outcome was survival to discharge. Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed by categorical gestational age (preterm, <37 weeks; early term, 37-38 weeks; late term, >39 weeks) by intended and actual route of delivery and by birth plan conformity, regardless of route.
RESULTS: Of 214 live born babies (gestational age, 37.6 ± 4.0 weeks; birth weight, 3064 ± 696 g), 143 (66.8%) had a prenatal diagnosis and 174 (81.3%) survived to discharge. Among 143 prenatally diagnosed pregnancies, 122 (85.3%) underwent abdominal delivery (AD) and 21 (14.6%) underwent cesarean delivery (CS). Conformity between intended and actual delivery occurred in 119 (83.2%). Neither categorical gestational age nor delivery route influenced outcome. Although babies delivered by planned CS had a lower mortality than those delivered by planned AD (2/21 and 36/122, respectively; P = .04), this difference was not significant by multivariate analysis. Conformity to any birth plan was associated with a trend toward improved survival.
CONCLUSION: Our data do not support advocacy of any specific delivery plan or route nor optimal gestational age for prenatally diagnosed CDH.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21129540     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  7 in total

1.  Predicting death or extended length of stay in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  K Murthy; E K Pallotto; J Gien; B S Brozanski; N F M Porta; I Zaniletti; S Keene; L G Chicoine; N E Rintoul; F D Dykes; J M Asselin; B L Short; M A Padula; D J Durand; K M Reber; J R Evans; T R Grover
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Prenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia: optimal mode of delivery?

Authors:  C M Burgos; B Frenckner; M Luco; M T Harting; P A Lally; K P Lally
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Antenatal use of bosentan and/or sildenafil attenuates pulmonary features in rats with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  María de Lourdes Lemus-Varela; Amed Soliz; Belinda Claudia Gómez-Meda; Ana Lourdes Zamora-Perez; José Manuel Ornelas-Aguirre; Valery Melnikov; Blanca Miriam Torres-Mendoza; Guillermo Moisés Zúñiga-González
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.764

4.  Risk factors for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in the Bogota birth defects surveillance and follow-up program, Colombia.

Authors:  Ana M García; S Machicado; G Gracia; I M Zarante
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  The Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Evidence Review Project: Developing national guidelines for care.

Authors:  Pramod S Puligandla; Erik D Skarsgard
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 6.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Authors:  Juan A Tovar
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.123

7.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: 25 years of shared knowledge; what about survival?

Authors:  Satyan Lakshminrusimha; Payam Vali
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.990

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.