ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: The bark of Amphipterygium adstringens (Aa) is commonly mixed or adulterated with the bark of Cyrtocarpa procera (Cp) and sold in Mexican markets. Aa is a well known species in Mexico used as decoction to relieve ulcers. Scientific reports reinforcing the anti-ulcer activity of Aa have been previously described, but those describing the anti-ulcer properties of Cp as a substitute for Aa in folk medicine are scarce. AIM OF THE STUDY: To investigate anatomical and phytochemical differences between these species, as well as to assess the anti-ulcer effect of Cp extracts in comparison to the Aa extracts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anatomical micro-technique and physical and spectroscopic data were used to analyze differences between Cp and Aa. Regard to the pharmacological activity, it was assessed by using the ethanol-induced gastric damage model in rats. RESULTS: Whereas the bark anatomy of Aa was characterized by vertical canals in the periderm and the rare occurrence of fibers in its phloem, a periderm without vertical canals and abundant fibers in the phloem were distinctive features of Cp. Phytochemical analysis allowed the identification of tirucallane, masticadienonic and 3α-hydroxymasticadienonic acids as major components in Aa, while β-amyrin and β-sitosterol were obtained from Cp. Gastric lesions observed in the control group decreased in the presence of 100mg/kg of hexane, ethyl acetate and methanol extracts from the normal or regenerated bark of Cp, thus resembling the anti-ulcer effect of Aa. Nevertheless, major anti-ulcer potency was observed with the most active methanol extract from Cp obtained from normal [the effective dose fifty ED(50)=45.54 mg/kg] or regenerated (ED(50)=36.68 mg/kg) bark in comparison to Aa (ED(50)=115.64 mg/kg). CONCLUSION: Chemical and anatomical differences were found between these species, but since the anti-ulcer activity of Cp is similar to that shown by Aa our results reinforce the use of both species for the relief of gastric ulcer in folk medicine.
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: The bark of Amphipterygium adstringens (Aa) is commonly mixed or adulterated with the bark of Cyrtocarpa procera (Cp) and sold in Mexican markets. Aa is a well known species in Mexico used as decoction to relieve ulcers. Scientific reports reinforcing the anti-ulcer activity of Aa have been previously described, but those describing the anti-ulcer properties of Cp as a substitute for Aa in folk medicine are scarce. AIM OF THE STUDY: To investigate anatomical and phytochemical differences between these species, as well as to assess the anti-ulcer effect of Cp extracts in comparison to the Aa extracts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anatomical micro-technique and physical and spectroscopic data were used to analyze differences between Cp and Aa. Regard to the pharmacological activity, it was assessed by using the ethanol-induced gastric damage model in rats. RESULTS: Whereas the bark anatomy of Aa was characterized by vertical canals in the periderm and the rare occurrence of fibers in its phloem, a periderm without vertical canals and abundant fibers in the phloem were distinctive features of Cp. Phytochemical analysis allowed the identification of tirucallane, masticadienonic and 3α-hydroxymasticadienonic acids as major components in Aa, while β-amyrin and β-sitosterol were obtained from Cp. Gastric lesions observed in the control group decreased in the presence of 100mg/kg of hexane, ethyl acetate and methanol extracts from the normal or regenerated bark of Cp, thus resembling the anti-ulcer effect of Aa. Nevertheless, major anti-ulcer potency was observed with the most active methanol extract from Cp obtained from normal [the effective dose fifty ED(50)=45.54 mg/kg] or regenerated (ED(50)=36.68 mg/kg) bark in comparison to Aa (ED(50)=115.64 mg/kg). CONCLUSION: Chemical and anatomical differences were found between these species, but since the anti-ulcer activity of Cp is similar to that shown by Aa our results reinforce the use of both species for the relief of gastric ulcer in folk medicine.
Authors: Ahmed I Rushdi; Nuru Adgaba; Noofal I M Bayaqoob; Ahmed Al-Khazim; Bernd I T Simoneit; Aarif H El-Mubarak; Khalid F Al-Mutlaq Journal: Springerplus Date: 2014-05-20
Authors: Ahmad A Al-Ghamdi; Nowfal I M Bayaqoob; Ahmed I Rushdi; Yehya Alattal; Bernd R T Simoneit; Aarif H El-Mubarak; Khalid F Al-Mutlaq Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Karla S Martinez-Elizalde; Marco A Rodriguez-Monroy; Cesar M Flores; Luis B Hernandez-Portilla; Elizabeth Barbosa-Cabrera; Ma Margarita Canales-Martinez Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Mario Rodriguez-Canales; Elizdath Martinez-Galero; Alma D Nava-Torres; Luvia E Sanchez-Torres; Leticia Garduño-Siciliano; Maria Margarita Canales-Martinez; Luis I Terrazas; Marco A Rodriguez-Monroy Journal: Mediators Inflamm Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 4.711