Literature DB >> 21129344

Analysis of the NovoPen® Echo for the delivery of insulin: a comparison of usability, functionality, and preference among pediatric subjects, their parents, and health care professionals.

Carey Reynholds1, Zoltan Antal.   

Abstract

In the current issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Dr. Olsen and colleagues analyzed the attitudes of children, their caregivers, and health care professional towards the usability, functionality, and preference of the NovoPen® Echo (Novo Nordisk Inc., Princeton, NJ). A comparison is made to two other insulin pen devices with half-unit increment capability--the NovoPen Junior and the HumaPen® Luxura® (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN). Their results support the idea that the NovoPen Echo has the highest overall satisfaction among pen devices capable of delivering half-unit increments, is equally simple to assemble and inject, and has the added benefit of a simple recall memory function. A major concern is their finding that fewer adolescents dialed a dose correctly with NovoPen Echo than with the other two pens tested. Furthermore, the true test in validating their claims of the importance of this device lays in future studies, which should be undertaken to demonstrate that a preferred delivery device actually leads to improved compliance in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
© 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21129344      PMCID: PMC3005059          DOI: 10.1177/193229681000400623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  5 in total

1.  The impact of modifiable family factors on glycemic control among youth with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Deborah A Butler; Jessica B Zuehlke; Alison Tovar; Lisa K Volkening; Barbara J Anderson; Lori M B Laffel
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.866

2.  Beneficial effects of intensive therapy of diabetes during adolescence: outcomes after the conclusion of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT).

Authors:  N H White; P A Cleary; W Dahms; D Goldstein; J Malone; W V Tamborlane
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Accuracy of pen injectors versus insulin syringes in children with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  A N Lteif; W F Schwenk
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 4.  Health economics and compliance of vials/syringes versus pen devices: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Carl V Asche; Laura Shane-McWhorter; Swetha Raparla
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Relationship between glycemic control, ethnicity and socioeconomic status in Hispanic and white non-Hispanic youths with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Angela R Gallegos-Macias; Santiago R Macias; Ellen Kaufman; Betty Skipper; Norton Kalishman
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.866

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Advances in Care for Insulin-Requiring Patients Without Closed Loop.

Authors:  Rayhan A Lal; Bruce Buckingham; David M Maahs
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 2.  Insulin delivery methods: Past, present and future.

Authors:  Rima B Shah; Manhar Patel; David M Maahs; Viral N Shah
Journal:  Int J Pharm Investig       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 3.  Insulin-delivery methods for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Zavuga Zuberi; Elingarami Sauli; Liu Cun; Jing Deng; Wen-Jun Li; Xu-Liang He; Wen Li
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.565

Review 4.  NovoPen Echo(®) insulin delivery device.

Authors:  Jacob Hyllested-Winge; Thomas Sparre; Line Kynemund Pedersen
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-01-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.