Literature DB >> 21129343

Novopen Echo® for the delivery of insulin: a comparison of usability, functionality and preference among pediatric subjects, their parents, and health care professionals.

Birthe S Olsen1, Søren Kruse Lilleøre, Conny Nøhr Korsholm, Thorben Kracht.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in insulin pen design and functionality, the selection of pens available for children with diabetes is limited. This study assessed the usability, functionality and attitudes towards NovoPen Echo®, a new durable insulin pen designed for pediatric patients that combines a simple memory function with half-increment dosing, versus NovoPen® Junior and HumaPen® Luxura™ HD in pediatric subjects, their parents, and health care professionals (HCPs).
METHODS: Pens were evaluated in random order during 1:1 interviews in the three target groups (pediatric subjects, parents, and HCPs) in Germany, France, and Canada. Study participants were asked to prepare each pen, perform injections into foam cushions, and provide feedback via a standardized questionnaire.
RESULTS: In total, 205 participants were included in the study. On a scale of 1-6 (1=most favorable; 6=least favorable regarding overall appearance, shape, colors, thickness and length), NovoPen Echo received the most favorable rating for design and overall appearance (mean±standard deviation=1.71±0.79) compared with NovoPen Junior (2.02±0.93) and HumaPen Luxura HD (2.36±1.01). Furthermore, 89% of pediatric subjects and 94% of parents rated the memory function of NovoPen Echo as very easy/easy to use. When asked to rate the pens overall, 80% of participants preferred NovoPen Echo to the other pens (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate a high overall level of satisfaction with NovoPen Echo among pediatric subjects, parents, and HCPs. The novel design aspects of NovoPen Echo, namely the simple memory function, half-increment units and, ease of use and design, may contribute towards promoting treatment adherence, which is essential in the pediatric setting.
© 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21129343      PMCID: PMC3005058          DOI: 10.1177/193229681000400622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  14 in total

1.  A cross-sectional international survey of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in 377 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus from 10 countries.

Authors:  Thomas Danne; Tadej Battelino; Olga Kordonouri; Ragnar Hanas; Christof Klinkert; Johnny Ludvigsson; Raquel Barrio; Christine Aebi; Sylvia Gschwend; Primus-E Mullis; Urs Schumacher; Urs Zumsteg; Anita Morandi; Ivana Rabbone; Valentino Cherubini; Sonia Toni; Carine de Beaufort; Peter Hindmarsh; Alex Sumner; Willie M van Waarde; Norbert van den Berg; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.866

2.  An evaluation of patient preference for an alternative insulin delivery system compared to standard vial and syringe.

Authors:  Karen Stockl; Caron Ory; Ann Vanderplas; Lars Nicklasson; William Lyness; David Cobden; Eunice Chang
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.580

3.  Compliance and administration methods in management of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Fortunato Lombardo; G Salzano; Maria Francesca Messina; Filippo De Luca
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2005

4.  Phobia of self-injecting and self-testing in insulin-treated diabetes patients: opportunities for screening.

Authors:  E D Mollema; F J Snoek; R J Heine; H M van der Ploeg
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Adherence to insulin treatment, glycaemic control, and ketoacidosis in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The DARTS/MEMO Collaboration. Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland. Medicines Monitoring Unit.

Authors:  A D Morris; D I Boyle; A D McMahon; S A Greene; T M MacDonald; R W Newton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-11-22       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Medication adherence and the associated health-economic impact among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus converting to insulin pen therapy: an analysis of third-party managed care claims data.

Authors:  Won Chan Lee; Sanjeev Balu; David Cobden; Ashish V Joshi; Chris L Pashos
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Missed bolus doses: devastating for metabolic control in CSII-treated adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Anna Lindholm Olinder; Anna Kernell; Bibbi Smide
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.866

8.  Accuracy and reproducibility of low dose insulin administration using pen-injectors and syringes.

Authors:  M G Gnanalingham; P Newland; C P Smith
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 9.  Insulin delivery with FlexPen: dose accuracy, patient preference and adherence.

Authors:  A Pfützner; T Asakura; B Sommavilla; Wc Lee
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.648

10.  A multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, two-period crossover trial of preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen and conventional vial/syringe for insulin injection in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Mary Korytkowski; David Bell; Carol Jacobsen; Rudee Suwannasari
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.393

View more
  18 in total

1.  Challenges in Delivering Smaller Doses of Insulin.

Authors:  Brigitte I Frohnert; G Todd Alonso
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 2.  Use of technology when assessing adherence to diabetes self-management behaviors.

Authors:  Kimberly A Driscoll; Deborah Young-Hyman
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Ease of use of two reusable, half-unit increment dosing insulin pens by adult caregivers of children with type 1 diabetes: a randomized, crossover comparison.

Authors:  Mayme Wong; Radhi Abdulnabi; Haoda Fu
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-01

Review 4.  Half-Unit Insulin Pens: Disease Management in Patients With Diabetes Who Are Sensitive to Insulin.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Irina Nayberg; Udo Stauder; Hamid Oualali; Catherine Domenger
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-28

5.  Needle with a novel attachment versus conventional screw-thread needles: a preference and ease-of-use test among children and adolescents with diabetes.

Authors:  Paul Hofman; Søren Kruse Lilleøre; Gitte Ter-Borch
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

Review 6.  What can we learn from patient-reported outcomes of insulin pen devices?

Authors:  Barbara J Anderson; Maria J Redondo
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

Review 7.  Digital Diabetes Management: A Literature Review of Smart Insulin Pens.

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Oliver Schnell; Bernhard Gehr; Nanette C Schloot; Sven W Görgens; Christoph Görgen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-11

8.  Decision coaching using the Ottawa family decision guide with parents and their children: a field testing study.

Authors:  Bryan Feenstra; Margaret L Lawson; Denise Harrison; Laura Boland; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Evaluation of preference for a novel durable insulin pen with memory function among patients with diabetes and health care professionals.

Authors:  Gerhard Klausmann; Irene Hramiak; Marianne Qvist; Kristian Handberg Mikkelsen; Xiaohui Guo
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 10.  A Systematic Review of Patients' Perspectives on the Subcutaneous Route of Medication Administration.

Authors:  Colin H Ridyard; Dalia M M Dawoud; Lorna V Tuersley; Dyfrig A Hughes
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.