Literature DB >> 21128868

Proposed BioRepository platform solution for the ALS research community.

Alex Sherman1, Robert Bowser, Daniela Grasso, Breen Power, Carol Milligan, Matthew Jaffa, Merit Cudkowicz.   

Abstract

ALS is a rare disorder whose cause and pathogenesis is largely unknown ( 1 ). There is a recognized need to develop biomarkers for ALS to better understand the disease, expedite diagnosis and to facilitate therapy development. Collaboration is essential to obtain a sufficient number of samples to allow statistically meaningful studies. The availability of high quality biological specimens for research purposes requires the development of standardized methods for collection, long-term storage, retrieval and distribution of specimens. The value of biological samples to scientists and clinicians correlates with the completeness and relevance of phenotypical and clinical information associated with the samples ( 2 , 3 ). While developing a secure Web-based system to manage an inventory of multi-site BioRepositories, algorithms were implemented to facilitate ad hoc parametric searches across heterogeneous data sources that contain data from clinical trials and research studies. A flexible schema for a barcode label was introduced to allow association of samples to these data. The ALSBank™ BioRepository platform solution for managing biological samples and associated data is currently deployed by the Northeast ALS Consortium (NEALS). The NEALS Consortium and the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Neurology Clinical Trials Unit (NCTU) support a network of multiple BioBanks, thus allowing researchers to take advantage of a larger specimen collection than they might have at an individual institution. Standard operating procedures are utilized at all collection sites to promote common practices for biological sample integrity, quality control and associated clinical data. Utilizing this platform, we have created one of the largest virtual collections of ALS-related specimens available to investigators studying ALS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21128868     DOI: 10.3109/17482968.2010.539233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler        ISSN: 1471-180X


  5 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of start-up, retention, and adherence in ALS clinical trials.

Authors:  Nazem Atassi; Padmaja Yerramilli-Rao; Jackie Szymonifka; Hong Yu; Marianne Kearney; Daniela Grasso; Jing Deng; Mark Levine-Weinberg; Jordan Shapiro; Alexandra Lee; Lucia Joseph; Eric A Macklin; Merit E Cudkowicz
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Combination of neurofilament heavy chain and complement C3 as CSF biomarkers for ALS.

Authors:  Jeban Ganesalingam; Jiyan An; Christopher E Shaw; Gerry Shaw; David Lacomis; Robert Bowser
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.372

Review 3.  Biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: opportunities and limitations.

Authors:  Robert Bowser; Martin R Turner; Jeremy Shefner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  To Share or Not to Share? A Survey of Biomedical Researchers in the U.S. Southwest, an Ethnically Diverse Region.

Authors:  Mai H Oushy; Rebecca Palacios; Alan E C Holden; Amelie G Ramirez; Kipling J Gallion; Mary A O'Connell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Initial Identification of a Blood-Based Chromosome Conformation Signature for Aiding in the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Matthew Salter; Emily Corfield; Aroul Ramadass; Francis Grand; Jayne Green; Jurjen Westra; Chun Ren Lim; Lucy Farrimond; Emily Feneberg; Jakub Scaber; Alexander Thompson; Lynn Ossher; Martin Turner; Kevin Talbot; Merit Cudkowicz; James Berry; Ewan Hunter; Alexandre Akoulitchev
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 8.143

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.