Literature DB >> 21128841

Intra-individual variability of CO₂ breath isotope enrichment compared to blood glucose in the oral glucose tolerance test.

Pooja Singal1, Morteza Janghorbani, Sally A Schuette, Robin Chisholm, Kieren J Mather.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glucose tolerance can be assessed noninvasively using (13)C-labeled glucose added to a standard oral glucose load, by measuring isotope-enriched CO(2) in exhaled air. In addition to the clear advantage of the noninvasive measurements, this approach may be of value in overcoming the high variability in blood glucose determination.
METHODS: We compared within-individual variability of breath CO(2) isotope enrichment with that for blood glucose in a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) by adding 150 mg of d-[(13)C]glucose ((13)C 99%) to a standard 75-g glucose load. Measurements of whole blood glucose (by glucose oxidase) and breath isotope enrichment (by isotope ratio mass spectrometry) were made every 30  min for 3 h. Subjects underwent three repeat tests over a 3-week period. Values for variability of breath isotope enrichment at 3 h (∂‰180) and of area under the curve for enrichment to 180  min (AUC180) were compared with variability of the 2-h OGTT blood glucose.
RESULTS: Breath test-derived measures exhibited lower within-subject variability than the 2-h OGTT glucose. The coefficient of variation for ∂‰180 was 7.4 ± 3.9% (mean ± SD), for AUC180 was 9.4 ± 6.3%, and for 2-h OGTT blood glucose was 13 ± 7.1% (P = 0.005 comparing ∂‰180 versus 2-h blood glucose; P = 0.061 comparing AUC180 versus 2-h blood glucose; P = 0.03 comparing ∂‰180 versus AUC180).
CONCLUSIONS: Breath test-derived measurements of glucose handling had lower within-subject variability versus the standard 2-h blood glucose reading used in clinical practice. These findings support further development of this noninvasive method for evaluating glucose tolerance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21128841      PMCID: PMC3014756          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2010.0109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  8 in total

1.  Variation of postprandial plasma glucose, palatability, and symptoms associated with a standardized mixed test meal versus 75 g oral glucose.

Authors:  T M Wolever; J L Chiasson; A Csima; J A Hunt; C Palmason; S A Ross; E A Ryan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Intra-individual variation of glucose, specific insulin and proinsulin concentrations measured by two oral glucose tolerance tests in a general Caucasian population: the Hoorn Study.

Authors:  J M Mooy; P A Grootenhuis; H de Vries; P J Kostense; C Popp-Snijders; L M Bouter; R J Heine
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: a simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in humans.

Authors:  A Katz; S S Nambi; K Mather; A D Baron; D A Follmann; G Sullivan; M J Quon
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Role of lipid oxidation in pathogenesis of insulin resistance of obesity and type II diabetes.

Authors:  J P Felber; E Ferrannini; A Golay; H U Meyer; D Theibaud; B Curchod; E Maeder; E Jequier; R A DeFronzo
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 9.461

6.  Novel noninvasive breath test method for screening individuals at risk for diabetes.

Authors:  E Lichar Dillon; Morteza Janghorbani; James A Angel; Shanon L Casperson; James J Grady; Randall J Urban; Elena Volpi; Melinda Sheffield-Moore
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Comparison of the [13C]glucose breath test to the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp when determining insulin resistance.

Authors:  Richard Z Lewanczuk; Breay W Paty; Ellen L Toth
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  A novel, non-invasive 13C-glucose breath test to estimate insulin resistance in obese prepubertal children.

Authors:  Mary M Jetha; Ugo Nzekwu; Richard Z Lewanczuk; Geoff D C Ball
Journal:  J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.634

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  [13C]glucose breath testing provides a noninvasive measure of insulin resistance: calibration analyses against clamp studies.

Authors:  Maysa Hussain; Morteza Jangorbhani; Sally Schuette; Robert V Considine; Robin L Chisholm; Kieren J Mather
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Failure of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia to compensate for impaired metabolic response to an oral glucose load.

Authors:  M Hussain; M Janghorbani; S Schuette; R V Considine; R L Chisholm; K J Mather
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 2.852

3.  The effects of isomaltulose ingestion on gastric parameters and cycling performance in young men.

Authors:  Masashi Miyashita; Yuka Hamada; Kyoko Fujihira; Saki Namura; Miki Sakazaki; Kiyoaki Miyasaka; Yukie Nagai
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.103

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.