Literature DB >> 21128647

Binding of β4γ5 by adenosine A1 and A2A receptors determined by stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture and mass spectrometry.

Dora Bigler Wang1, Nicholas E Sherman, John D Shannon, Susan A Leonhardt, Linnia H Mayeenuddin, Mark Yeager, William E McIntire.   

Abstract

Characterization of G protein βγ dimer isoform expression in different cellular contexts has been impeded by low levels of protein expression, broad isoform heterogeneity, and antibodies of limited specificity, sensitivity, or availability. As a new approach, we used quantitative mass spectrometry to characterize native βγ dimers associated with adenosine A(1):α(i1) and adenosine A(2A):α(S) receptor fusion proteins expressed in HEK-293 cells. Cells expressing A(1):α(i1) were cultured in media containing [(13)C(6)]Arg and [(13)C(6)]Lys and βγ labeled with heavy isotopes purified. Heavy βγ was combined with either recombinant βγ purified from Sf9 cells, βγ purified from the A(2A):α(S) expressed in HEK-293 cells cultured in standard media, or an enriched βγ fraction from HEK-293 cells. Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE, protein bands containing β and γ were excised, digested with trypsin, and separated by HPLC, and isotope ratios were analyzed by mass spectrometry. Three β isoforms, β(1), β(2), and β(4), and seven γ isoforms, γ(2), γ(4), γ(5), γ(7), γ(10), γ(11), and γ(12), were identified in the analysis. β(1) and γ(5) were most abundant in the enriched βγ fraction, and this βγ profile was generally mirrored in the fusion proteins. However, both A(2A):α(S) and A(1):α(i1) bound more β(4) and γ(5) compared to the enriched βγ fraction; also, more β(4) was associated with A(2A):α(S) than A(1):α(i1). Both fusion proteins also contained less γ(2), γ(10), and γ(12) than the enriched βγ fraction. These results suggest that preferences for particular βγ isoforms may be driven in part by structural motifs common to adenosine receptor family members.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21128647      PMCID: PMC3144317          DOI: 10.1021/bi101227y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  44 in total

1.  Expression and purification of functional G protein alpha subunits using a baculovirus expression system.

Authors:  S G Graber; R A Figler; J C Garrison
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Identification of two forms of the gamma subunit of G protein, gamma10 and gamma11, in bovine lung and their tissue distribution in the rat.

Authors:  R Morishita; H Ueda; K Kato; T Asano
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1998-05-22       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 3.  Role of subunit diversity in signaling by heterotrimeric G proteins.

Authors:  J D Hildebrandt
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 4.  Nobel Lecture. G proteins and regulation of adenylyl cyclase.

Authors:  A G Gilman
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  The 2.0 A crystal structure of a heterotrimeric G protein.

Authors:  D G Lambright; J Sondek; A Bohm; N P Skiba; H E Hamm; P B Sigler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Expression and purification of G-protein alpha subunits using baculovirus expression system.

Authors:  S G Graber; R A Figler; J C Garrison
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  A ternary complex model explains the agonist-specific binding properties of the adenylate cyclase-coupled beta-adrenergic receptor.

Authors:  A De Lean; J M Stadel; R J Lefkowitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1980-08-10       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  The G protein beta5 subunit interacts selectively with the Gq alpha subunit.

Authors:  J E Fletcher; M A Lindorfer; J M DeFilippo; H Yasuda; M Guilmard; J C Garrison
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-01-02       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Mice with deficiency of G protein gamma3 are lean and have seizures.

Authors:  William F Schwindinger; Kathryn E Giger; Kelly S Betz; Anna M Stauffer; Elaine M Sunderlin; Laura J Sim-Selley; Dana E Selley; Sarah K Bronson; Janet D Robishaw
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Double tagging recombinant A1- and A2A-adenosine receptors with hexahistidine and the FLAG epitope. Development of an efficient generic protein purification procedure.

Authors:  A S Robeva; R Woodard; D R Luthin; H E Taylor; J Linden
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1996-02-23       Impact factor: 5.858

View more
  3 in total

1.  Gγ identity dictates efficacy of Gβγ signaling and macrophage migration.

Authors:  Kanishka Senarath; John L Payton; Dinesh Kankanamge; Praneeth Siripurapu; Mithila Tennakoon; Ajith Karunarathne
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Subtype-dependent regulation of Gβγ signalling.

Authors:  Mithila Tennakoon; Kanishka Senarath; Dinesh Kankanamge; Kasun Ratnayake; Dhanushan Wijayaratna; Koshala Olupothage; Sithurandi Ubeysinghe; Kimberly Martins-Cannavino; Terence E Hébert; Ajith Karunarathne
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.850

3.  Differential localization of G protein βγ subunits.

Authors:  Katherine M Betke; Kristie L Rose; David B Friedman; Anthony J Baucum; Karren Hyde; Kevin L Schey; Heidi E Hamm
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.162

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.